On 19 juin 07, at 18:17, Rafaella Braconi wrote:
Hi Alessandro, Jean-Christophe,
Alessandro Cattelan wrote:
Jean-Christophe Helary ha scritto:
I think Rafaella should be able to provide you with proper TMX files
that match the .sdf contents.
Rafaella has already provided us with the OLH TMX some time ago.
yes, I was also suggesting jean-Christophe to use that tmx files
but I think that he really want to make sure to get the most
updated tmx files...
I am currently loading them and I don't see anything problematic.
The only problem I see with the method you propose is that we
would end
up having two TM. The TM I have is pretty big (over 12MB) and OmegaT
takes a long time to analyse it. If I put another big TM in the tm
folder I think it would end up being too slow. However, I'll have
a look
at that.
I am not clear about this. Why would you end up having 2 TMs?
Cannot one sinply use the most recent tMX files?
Anyway, as far as OmegaT is concerned that does not matter. It is
only the total number of segments to match that will lengthen he load
process.
I have just loaded the 8000 segments + 2 x 2000 segments TMXs
matching to the whole .sdf->pot file and it took less than 2mn on my
machine (MacBook duo core 2ghz/2gb) I also assigned 2gb to OmegaT -in
Java seerver mode (faster in general):
java -server -Xmx2048M -jar OmegaT.jar
JC
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
