> On Jan. 13, 2016, 12:59 p.m., Amareshwari Sriramadasu wrote:
> > lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/rewrite/RewriteUtil.java, 
> > line 134
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/42022/diff/2/?file=1186196#file1186196line134>
> >
> >     Can you check this with Hive 2.1 and see if we have to remove 
> > isCubeNode fully ?
> 
> Rajat Khandelwal wrote:
>     Yes. As in we don't *need* to remove it, but the function will never 
> return true with Hive >= 2.1
> 
> Amareshwari Sriramadasu wrote:
>     It may not even generate AST with Hive 2.1, if the query has a cube 
> keyword. We might have to do a replace "cube select " with "select ", even 
> before generating AST. Please check.

Yes, I've added code for that in my local environment. Trying to run example 
queries now. Will update review request.


- Rajat


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42022/#review114156
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 7, 2016, 4:36 p.m., Rajat Khandelwal wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/42022/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 7, 2016, 4:36 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for lens.
> 
> 
> Bugs: LENS-912
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-912
> 
> 
> Repository: lens
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/metadata/CubeMetastoreClient.java
>  e7550ca2c8307cba086e848e8b476a670366f7a5 
>   lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/rewrite/RewriteUtil.java 
> abec2b338e0da6b56934a02d16c48a6a7917845a 
>   lens-server/src/test/java/org/apache/lens/server/rewrite/TestRewriting.java 
> 202db822f41fc53e6dad8789d6cac62a8c9be68c 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42022/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Rajat Khandelwal
> 
>

Reply via email to