-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28555/#review63536
-----------------------------------------------------------



lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/CandidateFact.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/28555/#comment105803>

    Can we reuse methods getTimeDimOfPartitionColumn and 
getPartitionColumnOfTimeDim in CubeQueryContext?
    
    I'm fine moving them to cube and derivedcube directly


Overall changes look fine. Can you update tests also?

- Amareshwari Sriramadasu


On Dec. 2, 2014, 2:09 p.m., Rajat Khandelwal wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28555/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 2, 2014, 2:09 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for lens.
> 
> 
> Bugs: LENS-33
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-33
> 
> 
> Repository: lens
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> checkpoint
> 
> 
> checkpoint
> 
> 
> Merge branch 'master' of github.com:apache/incubator-lens into LENS-33
> 
> 
> checkpoint
> 
> 
> merge master
> 
> 
> Merge branch 'master' of github.com:apache/incubator-lens into LENS-33
> 
> 
> Merge branch 'master' of github.com:apache/incubator-lens into LENS-33
> 
> 
> checkpoint WIP
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/CandidateFact.java 
> ad6d3fb 
>   lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/CubeQueryContext.java 
> 2409db8 
>   lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/DimHQLContext.java 
> 0070ec2 
>   lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/DimOnlyHQLContext.java 
> 88a1b7d 
>   lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/FactHQLContext.java 
> a7819c1 
>   lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/StorageUtil.java 01cfcf7 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28555/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Rajat Khandelwal
> 
>

Reply via email to