On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 09:27 +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > Thorsten Scherler schrieb: > > [...] > > > Anyway since we have to get this release quickly out of the door I tend > > to agree on Bobs position (on which we already agreed on this list). > > > > - latest released version of Cocoon (2.1.10) in Lenya 2.0 > > +0 > > Like Jörn already pointed out, it's been a while since 2.1.10 has been > released. And if we'll do another release with 2.1.11 soon, the gap (and > the risk of incompatibilities) between 2.1.10 and 2.1.11 will probably > be larger than from the current 2.1.11-dev to 2.1.11. > > OTOH, either approach is fine with me if it helps to get 2.0 out of the > door. And given that we'll release 2.0.1 with 2.1.11 soon, I could live > with minor issues. I don't think that anyone will finish a project with > 2.0 and has to go live until 2.0.1 is released.
Since Bob agreed to the suggestion of using HEAD of cocoon, I think we are fine to use a certain revision number for cocoon. > > - quick 2.0.1 release immediately after Cocoon 2.1.11 is released > > +1 > > BTW, Thorsten - thanks again for organizing the release! > You are very welcome, just trying the best I can, like everybody in this community. :) Thanks everybody for testing and coding. salu2 > -- Andreas > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org Open Source Java consulting, training and solutions --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
