Thorsten Scherler wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 09:27 +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
Thorsten Scherler schrieb:
[...]
Anyway since we have to get this release quickly out of the door I tend
to agree on Bobs position (on which we already agreed on this list).
- latest released version of Cocoon (2.1.10) in Lenya 2.0
+0
Like Jörn already pointed out, it's been a while since 2.1.10 has been
released. And if we'll do another release with 2.1.11 soon, the gap (and
the risk of incompatibilities) between 2.1.10 and 2.1.11 will probably
be larger than from the current 2.1.11-dev to 2.1.11.
OTOH, either approach is fine with me if it helps to get 2.0 out of the
door. And given that we'll release 2.0.1 with 2.1.11 soon, I could live
with minor issues. I don't think that anyone will finish a project with
2.0 and has to go live until 2.0.1 is released.
Since Bob agreed to the suggestion of using HEAD of cocoon, I think we
are fine to use a certain revision number for cocoon.
- quick 2.0.1 release immediately after Cocoon 2.1.11 is released
+1
BTW, Thorsten - thanks again for organizing the release!
You are very welcome, just trying the best I can, like everybody in this
community. :)
Thanks everybody for testing and coding.
salu2
I know I'm late to the discussion. However, I would like to see us use a
'stable' release of Cocoon. I also want to get a release out the door.
If we can do a 2.0 release against a specific svn release of Cocoon,
then a quick 2.0.1 when 2.1.11 is released, that would work for me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
