May be Enchant interface is a good alternative way, if anyone going to implement a new spellchecker for OOo, as mentioned here: http://udu.wiki.ubuntu.com/SpellChecking?highlight=%28UduBof%29%7C%28LowPriority%29
http://www.abisource.com/projects/enchant/ says it has MySpell backend. So may be you can drop it between the exist architecture.. from [OOo] <--> [MySpell] to [OOo] <--> [Enchant] <--> [MySpell] and later on, if you come up with an alternative to MySpell, may be.. [OOo] <--> [Enchant] <--> [XySpell] hmm... This way, it allow everybody to experiment their own new spell checking engine. Given (an assumption) that Enchant provide enough info for every experimental spell checking engine. Curious if Enchant can provide a "context" information to the spell checking engine ? (since this is one of the limitations of all ispell-derivatives, which cares only word-on-focus and no surrounding words) Btw, I'm just an observer. cheers, Art --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
