> I assume that not all variations are valid for every word. So if you > are not controlling the process of accepting these variations then you > will get a false positive.
Yes, absolutely. Therefore the affixing logic must be quite clever. Which implies relatively sophisticated logic for an intermediate set of words. > Going backwards, if you are adding a lot of words then the problem is > the upstream dictionary. We must keep working on the upstream > dictionary to eliminate the problems at source not making correcting the > problem of adding to word lists. > > Perhaps we need a subscription button that delivers your word list to > the dictionary maintainer? Yes, that is a good idea. However, some maintainers work eagerly, others do very little and also that very slow; also an email for each word could be sometimes too much. Sometimes the email addresse of the maintainer cannot be found at all on the list. Also spamming could be a problem. I agree, however, we could try that. Thanks, Eleonora -- Weitersagen: GMX DSL-Flatrates mit Tempo-Garantie! Ab 4,99 Euro/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
