Eleonora wrote: >For grammar checking, tagging is essential for English, not so important for other languages.
The importance of tagging depends upon the language. For Archaic Chinese, it is more or less irrelevant. [It is fairly difficult to make a grammatical error in Archaic Chinese., But you can easily write something that means that complete opposite of what you mean.] For evidential grammars and noun-class grammars tagging is crucial for both spell-checking, and grammar checking. > I miss this statement from the mission statement. I understood the "language > neutral" expression as " easily configurable and adaptable general tool". +1 xan jonathon -- Does your Office Suite conform to ISO Standards? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
