oh for god sake. You old women. Put your blankets over your knees and go back to radio.
-----Original Message----- From: Matt Horn [mailto:matt.horn@;mediatelgroup.co.uk] Sent: 15 November 2002 10:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CF5 to MX upgrade I agree totally! HTTP = HyperTEXT Transfer Protocol it was never meant to carry images or Rich media files or anything like that it was meant to carry Text Matt At 10:19 15/11/2002, you wrote: >Some people here know my views on web page design and if I had my way we'd >all be viewing plain text. It's not necessarily Flash that is the problem >(although its very name has implications), but once people get their hands >on Rich Media they seem to become dyslexic, autistic or simply a failed fine >art student. There's enough designers who think they're developers without >developers thinking they're designers. I could go on forever, but without a >few pints to dumb your senses, you probably won't want to hear. > >Paolo > >-----Original Message----- >From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (REC) >[mailto:Neil.Robertson-Ravo@;csd.reedexpo.com] >Sent: 15 November 2002 09:55 >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CF5 to MX upgrade > > >Why wouldnt you touch Flash on an ecommerce site? > >-----Original Message----- >From: Paolo Piponi [mailto:paolo@;epoq.co.uk] >Sent: 15 November 2002 09:57 >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CF5 to MX upgrade > > >I won't touch Dreamweaver and I will never touch Flash or its ilk on an >ecommerce site. Other than that what the hell is an RIA? Something that >requires a rich bandwidth? > >Paolo > >-----Original Message----- >From: Colm Brazel [mailto:c.brazel@;ntlworld.ie] >Sent: 14 November 2002 17:15 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CF5 to MX upgrade > > > >>How many of us are sticking to CF5 and are perfectly happy with it? How >many >felt they had to upgrade and why? > > > >On a linux box I`m happy enough with CF5 but would put MX on there for the >extra $500 if I got business to warrant this (and more of these boxes as >well), but locally you can'y beat MX Studio and MX Server. MX is biggest >upgrade of Cf Server since ver1. Basically you cant work with RIA without >it, there's plenty of work there to get a proper handle on this stuff, Rich >Internet Applications using webservices, cfc's and Flash remoting and you >need MX to work properly with this stuff. ... > >rgds > >Colm > >-----Original Message----- >From: Paolo Piponi [mailto:paolo@;epoq.co.uk] >Sent: 14 November 2002 16:47 >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CF5 to MX upgrade > > >Tell me more. I don't want to, but I feel pressure to upgrade, even though >there is no specific need to. > >How many of us are sticking to CF5 and are perfectly happy with it? How many >felt they had to upgrade and why? > >Paolo > >-----Original Message----- >From: Mark Smyth [mailto:mark.smyth@;systemsunion.net] >Sent: 14 November 2002 16:26 >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CF5 to MX upgrade > > >i had loadds of problems, would recommed it at the moment > >we've delayed all upgrades of live sites until some of the problems are >resolved > >-----Original Message----- >From: Giles Roadnight [mailto:giles.roadnight@;goldcockerelbooks.co.uk] >Sent: 14 November 2002 16:28 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CF5 to MX upgrade > > >I had a complete nightmare. I was trying to upgrade on IIS but it kept >trying to install on the built in stand alone server. In the end I had >to install it on the stand alone, run the batch file to switch it over >to IIS then change some variable as I run a server with virtual sites. >Can't remember what this setting is or where but I am sure somebody else >will let you know. > >It took me all day to do the upgrade and the server was down for all >that time. > > >Giles Roadnight >http://giles.roadnight.name > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Steve Martin [mailto:steve.martin@;sequence.co.uk] >Sent: 14 November 2002 16:09 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CF5 to MX upgrade > >I trapped my finger in the server room door. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Mark Skeggs [mailto:mark.skeggs@;altour.co.uk] >Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 4:01 PM >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CF5 to MX upgrade > > >I came in at the weekend to upgrade ours a while ago..... > >Just when I thought every thing was done I went to leave and my car had >been >nicked > >-----Original Message----- >From: Paolo Piponi [mailto:paolo@;epoq.co.uk] >Sent: 14 November 2002 16:04 >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >Subject: [ cf-dev ] CF5 to MX upgrade > > >Can someone give me some nightmare stories so I know the worst that can >happen with upgrades on live websites. > >Paolo > >-- >** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >-- >** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >-- >** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >-- >** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >-- >** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >-- >** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >--- >Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 10/3/2002 > >--- >Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 10/3/2002 > > >-- >** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >-- >** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >-- >** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >-- >** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
