IMHO architecture board does not work and design by committee does not work. 
You really need a benevolent dictator.   

Regards
-Harshad


> On Sep 24, 2017, at 7:34 PM, Gasparakis, Joseph <joseph.gaspara...@intel.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>  Thank you all. Clearly option is the winner, and this is the direction we 
> take moving forward, thank you all for your voting. Voting is now closed. 
> 
> Regards, 
> 
> Joseph
> 
> 
> -------- Original message --------
> From: gu...@certusnet.com.cn
> Date: 9/23/17 03:17 (GMT-08:00)
> To: "Gasparakis, Joseph" <joseph.gaspara...@intel.com>, dev 
> <dev@lists.opencontrail.org>
> Subject: Re: [opencontrail-dev] [TSC WG] Transitioning to open source - 
> PLEASE VOTE
> 
> Hi,
>      Support option #2.
> 
> Regards
> Gengliang Guo
>  
> From: Gasparakis, Joseph
> Date: 2017-09-20 03:34
> To: 'dev@lists.opencontrail.org'
> Subject: [opencontrail-dev] [TSC WG] Transitioning to open source - PLEASE 
> VOTE
> Hi all,
>  
> Transitioning into an open source model it makes sense for Juniper to have 
> for the first public release more control than others since they have all the 
> knowledge and it makes sense for them to be able to prevent radical 
> architectural changes.
>  
> In the last TSC WG call we came up with a few proposals:
>  
> 1.       Allow someone in Juniper have veto powers to reject a proposed change
> 2.       Create an  Architectural Review Board (ARB as defined in 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zNIVEOY3XsnUdYKy1ddwgjJoOV-Iwx1pHU_8ViYlTFs/edit)
>  that will be reviewing in order to accept or reject architectural proposals, 
> and Juniper to have the majority of the seats so they can control by the 
> power of majority what goes in and what not.
>  
> If we decide for 2, we can choose at a later stage if we will have an ARB 
> ongoing or only for this first release.
>  
> Please vote one of the two options and for the sake of openness and 
> transparency REPLY ALL so your vote is visible to the whole list. If I 
> receive any private votes I will be forwarding them to this list.
>  
> Also please vote by end of day today as we would like to have this decision 
> made during the summit tomorrow.
>  
> Regards,
>  
> Joseph
>  
> --
> <image002(09-23-18-15-40).png>
> Joseph Gasparakis
> Intel Corporation
> Networking Platforms Group
> Architecture Division
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> Dev@lists.opencontrail.org
> http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.opencontrail.org
http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org

Reply via email to