On 15.04.2015 15:08, Nicolás Reynolds wrote: > a communication from the delegate can be backed by an url to the > discussion of parabola community. ceata doesn't care about the > discussion itself but it can corroborate the delegate was backed by the > community.
This has crossed my mind. But this means Ceata has to evaluate if some of the concerns expressed by some members have been addressed and solved, if those members confirm it's okay, if all members agree with the Delegate, Ceata doesn't know which are all the members, which have the right to decide, if they don't say anything it means they agree or it means they don't, etc This means a lot of interpretation is left to Ceata, which actually means Ceata steps in your governance. Not okay for Parabola nor for Ceata and I am not willing to parse discussions and put Ceata's Council to decide if what the Delegate has communicated is backed by the community or not quite... It'd be a nightmare. And Ceata could be held responsible by some of the members who don't agree (before or after) with what the Delegate saw fit to communicate to Ceata. -- Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic Președinte, Fundația Ceata +40-761-810-100 Susții libertatea artelor și tehnologiilor? Înscrie-te ca membru: http://ceata.org/%C3%AEnscrieri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
