On 04/15/2015 10:07 AM, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic wrote: > Nicolás Reynolds would act as a founder (which he is) and we all trust > him. We only have to figure out what happens when he isn't available to > appoint a new Delegate (he is lost on an island, he is in a comma, he > dies, etc). We can add a clause to be possible for the incumbent > Delegate and Ceata to void this agreement and sign a new one between > her/him and Ceata; if Nicolás Reynolds doesn't respond to Ceata for 2 > months, the Delegate can step in. My head hurts. :-) > > Does it make sense to go this way? > In my opinion, i think we could have a "vice delegate" for specific cases if the main one isn't available, also she/he could be the next successor and that period could learn about all related to the main delegate functionality.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
