On 15.04.2015 15:19, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic wrote: > On 15.04.2015 15:08, Nicolás Reynolds wrote: >> a communication from the delegate can be backed by an url to the >> discussion of parabola community. ceata doesn't care about the >> discussion itself but it can corroborate the delegate was backed by the >> community. > > This has crossed my mind. But this means Ceata has to evaluate if some > of the concerns expressed by some members have been addressed and > solved, if those members confirm it's okay, if all members agree with > the Delegate, Ceata doesn't know which are all the members, which have > the right to decide, if they don't say anything it means they agree or > it means they don't, etc > > This means a lot of interpretation is left to Ceata, which actually > means Ceata steps in your governance. Not okay for Parabola nor for > Ceata and I am not willing to parse discussions and put Ceata's Council > to decide if what the Delegate has communicated is backed by the > community or not quite... It'd be a nightmare. And Ceata could be held > responsible by some of the members who don't agree (before or after) > with what the Delegate saw fit to communicate to Ceata.
Oh, I think I got this figured out. The agreement has to parties: Ceata and Nicolás Reynolds. The Delegate is specified in 2(a) and (s)he signs a different paper, a declaration in which (s)he says: I agree to act as Parabola's Delegate in the terms of Ceata's Fiscal Sponsorship Agreement registered with the number __/20.04.2015. When a new Delegate assumes office, Nicolás Reynolds and Ceata's president sign an amendment modifying 2(a) to specify the new Delegate. The new Delegate signs a declaration (separate paper) saying (s)he agrees. Nicolás Reynolds would act as a founder (which he is) and we all trust him. We only have to figure out what happens when he isn't available to appoint a new Delegate (he is lost on an island, he is in a comma, he dies, etc). We can add a clause to be possible for the incumbent Delegate and Ceata to void this agreement and sign a new one between her/him and Ceata; if Nicolás Reynolds doesn't respond to Ceata for 2 months, the Delegate can step in. My head hurts. :-) Does it make sense to go this way? -- Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic Președinte, Fundația Ceata +40-761-810-100 Susții libertatea artelor și tehnologiilor? Înscrie-te ca membru: http://ceata.org/%C3%AEnscrieri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
