-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 04/15/2015 01:31 PM, Icarious wrote: >> In my opinion, i think we could have a "vice delegate" for specific >> cases if the main one isn't available, also she/he could be the next >> successor and that period could learn about all related to the main >> delegate functionality. > > +1. That sounds good. Specially the "learning the role" part > *** Agreed. However, like backups, you would need two in different places. More seriously, I think we should keep the contract between Ceata and *one* delegate. How the community handles the delegate, vice-delegate, backup vice-delegate, etc. should be a problem of the community, not Ceata.
== hk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVLqE+XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFQ0IyNkIyRTNDNzEyMTc2OUEzNEM4ODU0 ODA2QzM2M0ZDMTg5ODNEAAoJEEgGw2P8GJg93iEP/2SBA/Ak5ucsu0oGmPogA+YD SiXBDrd/cOzoF9ktXcWCVUUw9wXJ1yZSRYZjAW99VOz4VblD/8tNSwx6JyIzI9OA UWseyfOG9u/4tRHvH6Sr6NVPN7UrL9DMUP3iuw1vf+mvLlHpdlXjjOSTpc8wcMNb 4oR2wsuNvG3DJFhD4dtRnhgARmp6jeoMEYCxoJSzdhARSbPqCJOBxcPWMhuqVKXw 7J8tEtBmGRHCeB9lJb8B70WPg641MfmfQXiqFLqwl+sPyXDBQVrhjKWedmuMxR4t /FSmBFs7gIBetsMKjHDQ6QRrryQw9PXemsMefHXaZP+y1SzZV5qJmdZ60QXdb9sr 7/XDBbue0ZAdv1xNLnkpoEqYvoDeGJwS9ZsWz4+9AveCw94QRK9uOTQS1O//hpPU aoCEWyQrweoJOPl+TgZes6QyY59bAzFu+sDhDqC70UV1VMFpv7VIXRFOZNum19NS v2hEubTAN9GrG7iGDtQYCROvt1nLFwIk+emswEq/VDffMtFdsqD3eoS9Dz707UA7 /xNLvA9FD94uPrEU7TgPD6NY3M12BsVBV6X/0evmGlUSefQhVJ8r+iu9ZnO6yt8c ek3y0FoW1I3vSCHhOXOUJTlxpcUh05F6lK/dnqXpjaKOUZkn86K7THLycET+BU+Q /06YcrsUS763C4T7H3t6 =dBR3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
