On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 10:20:48AM -0300, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote: > I'm in favor of supporting Iridium instead of Chromium. > > While people may argue that there are not enough proof that Chromium has > freedom issues, I think it would be more risky if we were to overlook > the issue.
While I am one of those people, I do agree that the mere fact alone that Chromium has been under so much fire means it's too risky to include Chromium directly. Either using Iridium or Ungoogled-Chromium would be my suggestion. I would, however, like it if whichever project we choose (Iridium or Ungoogled-Chromium), that it be very careful about making sure that everything in Chromium is free. This may be a difficult task considering how fast Chromium's development is, however I believe that having outdated versions of Chromium is not as bad as having a non-free Chromium that nobody noticed. -- Nicolás Ortega Froysa (Deathsbreed) https://themusicinnoise.net/ http://uk7ewohr7xpjuaca.onion/ Public PGP Key: https://themusicinnoise.net/[email protected]_pub.asc http://uk7ewohr7xpjuaca.onion/[email protected]_pub.asc
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
