> Is this really an internal problem of Parabola? I say this because, > what if other distros adopt qt5-webengine? then it will become a > bigger problem not only for us, but for the other free distros too. > Maybe we should discuss this with the FSF and/or the GNU Project, they > could fork Chromium/Iridium/Ungoogled-chromium like they did with > Icecat (like creating an "Icemium"). I fail to see how a libre Chromium relates to or resolves the blacklisting of qt5-webengine. There has still been no evidence posted as to how qt5-webengine is non-free, nor has anyone accusing qt5-webengine of being non-free reported their claims upstream to Qt to be fixed at the source. (pun intended)
https://bugreports.qt.io/ -jc
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
