Title: Samsung Enterprise Portal mySingle

Hi Stephane

 

In our staging project "devel:x11:common", we don't have enlightenment and xf86-video-intel. It only has glproto.

And, there was no build error issue for glproto when I rebased xorg-server.

So I couldn't guess why your team wants to try to bump them.

If they need to bump, I think you can do that.

It will be good for you to bump 3 packages after our SRs are accepted to Tizen:Common.

 

BTW, in arm-x11 repo of devel:x11:common staging project, 2 failed error and 1 unresolvable error remain.

I can't guess how I can fix these issue. Probably I need help of maintainer who is in charge of these 3 packages or who is in charge of OBS project.

In your local build system, weren't there this kind of issues?

Could you give me any idea?

 

Boram

 

------- Original Message -------

Sender : Stéphane Desneux<[email protected]>

Date : 2014-07-30 19:35 (GMT+09:00)

Title : Re: [Dev] Common/X11 schedule

 

Hi Boram,

I updated our project with the 4 packages you updated.

1 new error occured, on xf86-video-intel (which is not up to date probably).

Also, what happens for these remaining packages:

https://github.com/Tarnyko/enlightenment.git     tizen
https://github.com/Tarnyko/xf86-video-intel.git  tizen
https://github.com/Tarnyko/glproto.git
5903b304417886de32ad620ff8874998ddee4254

I think we should still bump them all. Your opinion ?

--
Stéphane Desneux
Intel OTC - Vannes/FR
gpg:1CA35726/DFA9B0232EF80493AF2891FA24E3A2841CA35726

On 29/07/2014 14:49, Boram Park wrote:
> Hello Stephane
>
>  
>
> Today, I upgraded below 4 git repos to rebase xorg-server to 1.16. All
> patches are pushed in "devel/x11" branch.
>
>   platform/upstream/xorg-server
>
>   platform/upstream/xproto
>
>   platform/upstream/fontsproto
>
>   platform/upstream/libXfont
>
>  
>
> Please check wethere there are any issues in your side. If no issue,
> I'll send SRs together when I send SRs of x11 integration work.
>
>  
>
> Regards
>
> Boram
>
>  
>
> ------- *Original Message* -------
>
> *Sender* : Stéphane Desneux
>
> *Date* : 2014-07-29 16:46 (GMT+09:00)
>
> *Title* : Re: [Dev] Common/X11 schedule
>
>  
>
> Boram,
>
> No problem for patches. Merging into tizen branch makes just things
> easier (we can compare project manifests, submit diffs etc. easily)
>
> FYI: to submit multiple packages at the same time on Tizen:Common,
> please use 'group submissions'.
>
> See: §3.1.2 on
> https://source.tizen.org/documentation/developer-guide/getting-started-guide/contributing-code-tizen
> for guidelines
>
> This way, all 'related' packages that depend on each other will rebuild
> as a whole. If the result is ok (seen in prerelease project), I can
> accept the submission and bump all packages in the main project.
>
> Thanks
> --
> Stéphane Desneux
> Intel OTC - Vannes/FR
> gpg:1CA35726/DFA9B0232EF80493AF2891FA24E3A2841CA35726
>
> On 29/07/2014 08:39, Boram Park wrote:
>> Hello José and Stephane.
>>
>>  
>>
>> [just go to the branch tizen, how?]
>>
>> I didn't merge devel/x11 to tizen branch. just created new patch for
>> tizen branch.
>>
>> It seems to make you confused. Actually both branches have exactly same
>> patch.
>>
>> BTW, I'll merge devel/x11 to tizen branch.
>>
>>  
>>
>> And, I didn't send SRs yet.
>>
>> I concern that my SRs can be rejected by the maintainer of Tizen:Common
>> project. my SR will be able to be failed to build without other my SRs
>> becuase of build dependency.
>>
>> So far I saw many reject message becuase of build fail. So we are going
>> to send SRs after fixing all build-errors in staging project and merging
>> all our work to tizen branch.
>>
>> Anyway our all patches have been merged to tizen branch
>>
>>  
>>
>> [Diverging that have to be merged]
>> [Diverging, to be checked]
>> [Only of our side]
>> [Crosswalk compiled without scim]
>>
>> Above 4 entries seems OK. And gl issue of arm-x11 repo is solved when I
>> take your patch for SDL and mesa. Thx.
>>
>>  
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Boram
>>
>>  
>>
>>  
>>
>> ------- *Original Message* -------
>>
>> *Sender* : Jos� Bollo
>>
>> *Date* : 2014-07-26 01:23 (GMT+09:00)
>>
>> *Title* : Re: Re: [Dev] Common/X11 schedule
>>
>>  
>>
>> Please find here the real final report
>> BR
>> josé
>>
>> On ven, 2014-07-25 at 18:22 +0200, José Bollo wrote:
>>> Hello Boram,
>>>
>>> I just finished the report (see joined).
>>>
>>> You will find this entries:
>>>
>>> [nothing to do, already at the good revision]
>>>
>>> The branch tizen is already at the good revision for x11 that is already
>>> accepted by OBS since long time.
>>>
>>> [just go to the branch tizen, how?]
>>>
>>> The branch tizen is already at the good revision for x11 but was never
>>> accepted nor submitted, there is a workflow problem.
>>>
>>> [Diverging that have to be merged]
>>>
>>> mesa
>>>
>>> [Diverging, to be checked]
>>>
>>> SDL
>>>
>>> [Only of our side]
>>>
>>> libva
>>>
>>> [Crosswalk compiled without scim]
>>>
>>> crosswalk.
>>>
>>> [Bumped on github for upgrading xserver]
>>>
>>> An effort for upgrading xorg-server to 1.15.99.
>>> Part of it may be used for bumping to xorg-server 1.16
>>>
>>> Please check with Stephane for further work because I leaving this
>>> evening for few weeks.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> José
>>
>>  
>>
>> ------------------------------------------
>>
>> Boram Park
>>
>> Senior engineer
>>
>> SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD
>>
>> E-Mail : [email protected]
>>
>>  
>>
>
>  
>
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Boram Park
>
> Senior engineer
>
> SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD
>
> E-Mail : [email protected]
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to