Boram,

If I look at this page:
https://build.tizen.org/project/monitor?blocked=0&building=0&dispatching=0&finished=0&project=devel%3Ax11%3Acommon&scheduled=0&signing=0&succeeded=0

I see the following errors:

                       arm-wayland   arm-x11

image-configurations        ok        failed
libzypp                  failed         ok
wayland-fits                ok      unresolvable
zypper                      ok        failed

For me, there's nothing critical.

For zypper and libzypp: the arm builds randomly fail. I don't know why,
but this has nothing to do with X11 or wayland.  Simply trigger a
rebuild for those 2 packages (or do an 'osc rebuild --failed'). They
should pass.

For image-configurations: there's a bug in the packaging. If no image is
defined for the current repo, the build fails. This is something I'll
fix soon.

For wayland-fits: obviously, it's built for X11 but it shouldn't. It's
already fixed, but I'm waiting for the review
https://review.tizen.org/gerrit/#/c/24985/ to be merged to be able to
submit to OBS.


If the errors above were not the ones that you noticed previously,
please give more details.

Thanks
-- 
Stéphane Desneux
Intel OTC - Vannes/FR
gpg:1CA35726/DFA9B0232EF80493AF2891FA24E3A2841CA35726

On 30/07/2014 13:56, Boram Park wrote:
> Hi Stephane
> 
>  
> 
> In our staging project "devel:x11:common", we don't have enlightenment
> and xf86-video-intel. It only has glproto.
> 
> And, there was no build error issue for glproto when I rebased xorg-server.
> 
> So I couldn't guess why your team wants to try to bump them.
> 
> If they need to bump, I think you can do that.
> 
> It will be good for you to bump 3 packages after our SRs are accepted to
> Tizen:Common.
> 
>  
> 
> BTW, in arm-x11 repo of devel:x11:common staging project, 2 failed error
> and 1 unresolvable error remain.
> 
> I can't guess how I can fix these issue. Probably I need help of
> maintainer who is in charge of these 3 packages or who is in charge of
> OBS project.
> 
> In your local build system, weren't there this kind of issues?
> 
> Could you give me any idea?
> 
>  
> 
> Boram
> 
>  
> 
> ------- *Original Message* -------
> 
> *Sender* : Stéphane Desneux<[email protected]>
> 
> *Date* : 2014-07-30 19:35 (GMT+09:00)
> 
> *Title* : Re: [Dev] Common/X11 schedule
> 
>  
> 
> Hi Boram,
> 
> I updated our project with the 4 packages you updated.
> 
> 1 new error occured, on xf86-video-intel (which is not up to date probably).
> 
> Also, what happens for these remaining packages:
> 
> https://github.com/Tarnyko/enlightenment.git     tizen
> https://github.com/Tarnyko/xf86-video-intel.git  tizen
> https://github.com/Tarnyko/glproto.git
> 5903b304417886de32ad620ff8874998ddee4254
> 
> I think we should still bump them all. Your opinion ?
> 
> -- 
> Stéphane Desneux
> Intel OTC - Vannes/FR
> gpg:1CA35726/DFA9B0232EF80493AF2891FA24E3A2841CA35726
> 
> On 29/07/2014 14:49, Boram Park wrote:
>> Hello Stephane
>>
>>  
>>
>> Today, I upgraded below 4 git repos to rebase xorg-server to 1.16. All
>> patches are pushed in "devel/x11" branch.
>>
>>   platform/upstream/xorg-server
>>
>>   platform/upstream/xproto
>>
>>   platform/upstream/fontsproto
>>
>>   platform/upstream/libXfont
>>
>>  
>>
>> Please check wethere there are any issues in your side. If no issue,
>> I'll send SRs together when I send SRs of x11 integration work.
>>
>>  
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Boram
>>
>>  
>>
>> ------- *Original Message* -------
>>
>> *Sender* : Stéphane Desneux
>>
>> *Date* : 2014-07-29 16:46 (GMT+09:00)
>>
>> *Title* : Re: [Dev] Common/X11 schedule
>>
>>  
>>
>> Boram,
>>
>> No problem for patches. Merging into tizen branch makes just things
>> easier (we can compare project manifests, submit diffs etc. easily)
>>
>> FYI: to submit multiple packages at the same time on Tizen:Common,
>> please use 'group submissions'.
>>
>> See: §3.1.2 on
>>
> https://source.tizen.org/documentation/developer-guide/getting-started-guide/contributing-code-tizen
>> for guidelines
>>
>> This way, all 'related' packages that depend on each other will rebuild
>> as a whole. If the result is ok (seen in prerelease project), I can
>> accept the submission and bump all packages in the main project.
>>
>> Thanks
>> --
>> Stéphane Desneux
>> Intel OTC - Vannes/FR
>> gpg:1CA35726/DFA9B0232EF80493AF2891FA24E3A2841CA35726
>>
>> On 29/07/2014 08:39, Boram Park wrote:
>>> Hello José and Stephane.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> [just go to the branch tizen, how?]
>>>
>>> I didn't merge devel/x11 to tizen branch. just created new patch for
>>> tizen branch.
>>>
>>> It seems to make you confused. Actually both branches have exactly same
>>> patch.
>>>
>>> BTW, I'll merge devel/x11 to tizen branch.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> And, I didn't send SRs yet.
>>>
>>> I concern that my SRs can be rejected by the maintainer of Tizen:Common
>>> project. my SR will be able to be failed to build without other my SRs
>>> becuase of build dependency.
>>>
>>> So far I saw many reject message becuase of build fail. So we are going
>>> to send SRs after fixing all build-errors in staging project and merging
>>> all our work to tizen branch.
>>>
>>> Anyway our all patches have been merged to tizen branch
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> [Diverging that have to be merged]
>>> [Diverging, to be checked]
>>> [Only of our side]
>>> [Crosswalk compiled without scim]
>>>
>>> Above 4 entries seems OK. And gl issue of arm-x11 repo is solved when I
>>> take your patch for SDL and mesa. Thx.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Boram
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> ------- *Original Message* -------
>>>
>>> *Sender* : Jos� Bollo
>>>
>>> *Date* : 2014-07-26 01:23 (GMT+09:00)
>>>
>>> *Title* : Re: Re: [Dev] Common/X11 schedule
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Please find here the real final report
>>> BR
>>> josé
>>>
>>> On ven, 2014-07-25 at 18:22 +0200, José Bollo wrote:
>>>> Hello Boram,
>>>>
>>>> I just finished the report (see joined).
>>>>
>>>> You will find this entries:
>>>>
>>>> [nothing to do, already at the good revision]
>>>>
>>>> The branch tizen is already at the good revision for x11 that is already
>>>> accepted by OBS since long time.
>>>>
>>>> [just go to the branch tizen, how?]
>>>>
>>>> The branch tizen is already at the good revision for x11 but was never
>>>> accepted nor submitted, there is a workflow problem.
>>>>
>>>> [Diverging that have to be merged]
>>>>
>>>> mesa
>>>>
>>>> [Diverging, to be checked]
>>>>
>>>> SDL
>>>>
>>>> [Only of our side]
>>>>
>>>> libva
>>>>
>>>> [Crosswalk compiled without scim]
>>>>
>>>> crosswalk.
>>>>
>>>> [Bumped on github for upgrading xserver]
>>>>
>>>> An effort for upgrading xorg-server to 1.15.99.
>>>> Part of it may be used for bumping to xorg-server 1.16
>>>>
>>>> Please check with Stephane for further work because I leaving this
>>>> evening for few weeks.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>> José
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Boram Park
>>>
>>> Senior engineer
>>>
>>> SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD
>>>
>>> E-Mail : [email protected]
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>
>>  
>>
>> ------------------------------------------
>>
>> Boram Park
>>
>> Senior engineer
>>
>> SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD
>>
>> E-Mail : [email protected]
>>
>>  
>>
> 
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to