Sorry. Made a mistake on util-macros.

Latest manifest_fix is here:

https://github.com/eurogiciel-oss/tizen-upstream-sync/blob/master/Tizen/Common/x11/manifest_fix.xml

-- 
Stéphane Desneux
Intel OTC - Vannes/FR
gpg:1CA35726/DFA9B0232EF80493AF2891FA24E3A2841CA35726

On 30/07/2014 19:12, Stéphane Desneux wrote:
> On 30/07/2014 13:56, Boram Park wrote:
>> Hi Stephane
>>
>>  
>>
>> In our staging project "devel:x11:common", we don't have enlightenment
>> and xf86-video-intel. It only has glproto.
> 
> You *should* add enlightenement and xf86-video-intel. We have the plan
> to bump both to appropriate versions. xf86-video-intel would be disabled
> on ARM architectures and enlightenment would be disabled for wayland.
> 
>> And, there was no build error issue for glproto when I rebased xorg-server.
>>
>> So I couldn't guess why your team wants to try to bump them.
> 
> Because there's a newer version that does build fine too :)
> 
>> If they need to bump, I think you can do that.
> 
> Yep. We'll take that.
> 
>> It will be good for you to bump 3 packages after our SRs are accepted to
>> Tizen:Common.
> 
> Sure.
> 
> FYI, here's the latest manifest fix to apply on "top" of Common (see
> attachment). Except enlightenment and xf86-video-intel which are still
> outside, everything points to either the tizen branch or the devel/x11
> branch.
> 
> The project is currently rebuilding with these adjustments. Results
> tomorrow :)
> 
>> BTW, in arm-x11 repo of devel:x11:common staging project, 2 failed error
>> and 1 unresolvable error remain.
>>
>> I can't guess how I can fix these issue. Probably I need help of
>> maintainer who is in charge of these 3 packages or who is in charge of
>> OBS project.
>>
>> In your local build system, weren't there this kind of issues?
> 
> I'll take a look and give you my feedback.
> 
>>
>> Could you give me any idea?
>>
>>  
>>
>> Boram
> 
> Stéphane
> -
> Stéphane Desneux
> Intel OTC - Vannes/FR
> gpg:1CA35726/DFA9B0232EF80493AF2891FA24E3A2841CA35726
> 
>> ------- *Original Message* -------
>>
>> *Sender* : Stéphane Desneux<[email protected]>
>>
>> *Date* : 2014-07-30 19:35 (GMT+09:00)
>>
>> *Title* : Re: [Dev] Common/X11 schedule
>>
>>  
>>
>> Hi Boram,
>>
>> I updated our project with the 4 packages you updated.
>>
>> 1 new error occured, on xf86-video-intel (which is not up to date probably).
>>
>> Also, what happens for these remaining packages:
>>
>> https://github.com/Tarnyko/enlightenment.git     tizen
>> https://github.com/Tarnyko/xf86-video-intel.git  tizen
>> https://github.com/Tarnyko/glproto.git
>> 5903b304417886de32ad620ff8874998ddee4254
>>
>> I think we should still bump them all. Your opinion ?
>>
>> -- 
>> Stéphane Desneux
>> Intel OTC - Vannes/FR
>> gpg:1CA35726/DFA9B0232EF80493AF2891FA24E3A2841CA35726
>>
>> On 29/07/2014 14:49, Boram Park wrote:
>>> Hello Stephane
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Today, I upgraded below 4 git repos to rebase xorg-server to 1.16. All
>>> patches are pushed in "devel/x11" branch.
>>>
>>>   platform/upstream/xorg-server
>>>
>>>   platform/upstream/xproto
>>>
>>>   platform/upstream/fontsproto
>>>
>>>   platform/upstream/libXfont
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Please check wethere there are any issues in your side. If no issue,
>>> I'll send SRs together when I send SRs of x11 integration work.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Boram
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> ------- *Original Message* -------
>>>
>>> *Sender* : Stéphane Desneux
>>>
>>> *Date* : 2014-07-29 16:46 (GMT+09:00)
>>>
>>> *Title* : Re: [Dev] Common/X11 schedule
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Boram,
>>>
>>> No problem for patches. Merging into tizen branch makes just things
>>> easier (we can compare project manifests, submit diffs etc. easily)
>>>
>>> FYI: to submit multiple packages at the same time on Tizen:Common,
>>> please use 'group submissions'.
>>>
>>> See: §3.1.2 on
>>>
>> https://source.tizen.org/documentation/developer-guide/getting-started-guide/contributing-code-tizen
>>> for guidelines
>>>
>>> This way, all 'related' packages that depend on each other will rebuild
>>> as a whole. If the result is ok (seen in prerelease project), I can
>>> accept the submission and bump all packages in the main project.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> --
>>> Stéphane Desneux
>>> Intel OTC - Vannes/FR
>>> gpg:1CA35726/DFA9B0232EF80493AF2891FA24E3A2841CA35726
>>>
>>> On 29/07/2014 08:39, Boram Park wrote:
>>>> Hello José and Stephane.
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> [just go to the branch tizen, how?]
>>>>
>>>> I didn't merge devel/x11 to tizen branch. just created new patch for
>>>> tizen branch.
>>>>
>>>> It seems to make you confused. Actually both branches have exactly same
>>>> patch.
>>>>
>>>> BTW, I'll merge devel/x11 to tizen branch.
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> And, I didn't send SRs yet.
>>>>
>>>> I concern that my SRs can be rejected by the maintainer of Tizen:Common
>>>> project. my SR will be able to be failed to build without other my SRs
>>>> becuase of build dependency.
>>>>
>>>> So far I saw many reject message becuase of build fail. So we are going
>>>> to send SRs after fixing all build-errors in staging project and merging
>>>> all our work to tizen branch.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway our all patches have been merged to tizen branch
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> [Diverging that have to be merged]
>>>> [Diverging, to be checked]
>>>> [Only of our side]
>>>> [Crosswalk compiled without scim]
>>>>
>>>> Above 4 entries seems OK. And gl issue of arm-x11 repo is solved when I
>>>> take your patch for SDL and mesa. Thx.
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Boram
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> ------- *Original Message* -------
>>>>
>>>> *Sender* : Jos� Bollo
>>>>
>>>> *Date* : 2014-07-26 01:23 (GMT+09:00)
>>>>
>>>> *Title* : Re: Re: [Dev] Common/X11 schedule
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> Please find here the real final report
>>>> BR
>>>> josé
>>>>
>>>> On ven, 2014-07-25 at 18:22 +0200, José Bollo wrote:
>>>>> Hello Boram,
>>>>>
>>>>> I just finished the report (see joined).
>>>>>
>>>>> You will find this entries:
>>>>>
>>>>> [nothing to do, already at the good revision]
>>>>>
>>>>> The branch tizen is already at the good revision for x11 that is already
>>>>> accepted by OBS since long time.
>>>>>
>>>>> [just go to the branch tizen, how?]
>>>>>
>>>>> The branch tizen is already at the good revision for x11 but was never
>>>>> accepted nor submitted, there is a workflow problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> [Diverging that have to be merged]
>>>>>
>>>>> mesa
>>>>>
>>>>> [Diverging, to be checked]
>>>>>
>>>>> SDL
>>>>>
>>>>> [Only of our side]
>>>>>
>>>>> libva
>>>>>
>>>>> [Crosswalk compiled without scim]
>>>>>
>>>>> crosswalk.
>>>>>
>>>>> [Bumped on github for upgrading xserver]
>>>>>
>>>>> An effort for upgrading xorg-server to 1.15.99.
>>>>> Part of it may be used for bumping to xorg-server 1.16
>>>>>
>>>>> Please check with Stephane for further work because I leaving this
>>>>> evening for few weeks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>> José
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Boram Park
>>>>
>>>> Senior engineer
>>>>
>>>> SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD
>>>>
>>>> E-Mail : [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Boram Park
>>>
>>> Senior engineer
>>>
>>> SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD
>>>
>>> E-Mail : [email protected]
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to