On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 02:31:07 +0200 Stéphane Desneux <[email protected]> said:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:29:23 +0200 Stéphane Desneux > > <[email protected]> said: > > > >> Well... Initially, I had to re-introduce enlightenment because of X11 > >> :-) For wayland versions, we have weston. > > > > enlightenment is also a wayland compositor... fyi. :) it provides a pretty > > much fuller desktop than weston does (weston is more complete in wl protocol > > support). > > > > Honestly, I don't want to restart the compositors war :-) > > e18 under wayland is out of scope right now for Tizen. > > The immediate demand is to have Tizen:Common on ARM/X11, and I don't see much > choices for the window manager. Maybe e16 would be a good candidate after > all: check my home desktop and you'll understand: > http://www.tiikoni.com/tis/view/?id=37f5d0a :) > > I'd prefer to offer some choices to people: > - enlightenment or weston for wayland environment (in 2 different images of > T:Common) - weston mandatory here, e18 as a bonus > - same enlightenment version for X11 (no other choice here!) > > It may help to compare how things were done in e18 and weston from the > wayland protocol POV. Also, some things may work with one and fail with the > other, which could also help to debug things, and finally fix them the right > way. > > But first, we need a (nice) desktop for X11. Let's run e18 on xorg 1.16 ! as i said- if you are going to use e18 - just use e git master. it is in BETTER shape than e18. > >> But anyway. I'll check with Manuel Bachmann (Tarnyko) and we may test > >> both options. > >> > >> Thx ! > >> -- > >> Stéphane Desneux > >> Intel OTC - Vannes/FR > >> gpg:1CA35726/DFA9B0232EF80493AF2891FA24E3A2841CA35726 > >> > >> On 30/07/2014 16:51, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > >>> On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 23:20:16 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > >>> <[email protected]> said: > >>> > >>> on more reflection... tizen common has no hope of dealing with tizen > >>> mobile as it stands without lots of work... so maybe it might be best to > >>> go to master - you'll get code in a much better state for wayland > >>> support. :) > >>> > >>>> On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:36:39 +0200 Stéphane Desneux > >>>> <[email protected]> said: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi Carsten, > >>>>> > >>>>> Is Enlightenment 0.18.7 a better candidate ? > >>>> > >>>> no. e17. as of e18 compositor is no longer a module. this totally kills > >>>> the compositor module fork of e's original compositor that was done for > >>>> e17 and tizen 2.x - this needs a re-do/design. this also changes how > >>>> clients/borders are handled api-wise. > >>>> > >>>>> It's not the latest one but it's far more recent than the 0.17.4 on > >>>>> tizen git. We took this version because it was quite aligned with EFL > >>>>> 1.9.3 which is the current EFL version on Tizen:Common. > >>>>> > >>>>> With these details, is it still a bad idea ? :) > >>>> > >>>> only if you want to break tizen mobile entirely (as a mobile style ui - > >>>> apps will still display - just in windows) - then sure. go for it. then > >>>> also remove all the custom samsung e profile packages and config and go > >>>> back to vanilla enlightenment - then no problems. :) you definitely then > >>>> want to nuke the tizen elementary theme too and go back to vanilla as > >>>> well. :) if you do this then may as well go for git master. :) > >>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Stéphane Desneux > >>>>> Intel OTC - Vannes/FR > >>>>> gpg:1CA35726/DFA9B0232EF80493AF2891FA24E3A2841CA35726 > >>>>> > >>>>> On 30/07/2014 14:37, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > >>>>>> On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:35:39 +0200 Stéphane Desneux > >>>>>> <[email protected]> said: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> bumping to enlightenment upstream is going to be... bad at this stage. > >>>>>> hold on that for the time-being. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi Boram, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I updated our project with the 4 packages you updated. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 1 new error occured, on xf86-video-intel (which is not up to date > >>>>>>> probably). > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Also, what happens for these remaining packages: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> https://github.com/Tarnyko/enlightenment.git tizen > >>>>>>> https://github.com/Tarnyko/xf86-video-intel.git tizen > >>>>>>> https://github.com/Tarnyko/glproto.git > >>>>>>> 5903b304417886de32ad620ff8874998ddee4254 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I think we should still bump them all. Your opinion ? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> Stéphane Desneux > >>>>>>> Intel OTC - Vannes/FR > >>>>>>> gpg:1CA35726/DFA9B0232EF80493AF2891FA24E3A2841CA35726 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 29/07/2014 14:49, Boram Park wrote: > >>>>>>>> Hello Stephane > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Today, I upgraded below 4 git repos to rebase xorg-server to 1.16. > >>>>>>>> All patches are pushed in "devel/x11" branch. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> platform/upstream/xorg-server > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> platform/upstream/xproto > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> platform/upstream/fontsproto > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> platform/upstream/libXfont > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Please check wethere there are any issues in your side. If no issue, > >>>>>>>> I'll send SRs together when I send SRs of x11 integration work. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Regards > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Boram > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> ------- *Original Message* ------- > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> *Sender* : Stéphane Desneux<[email protected]> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> *Date* : 2014-07-29 16:46 (GMT+09:00) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> *Title* : Re: [Dev] Common/X11 schedule > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Boram, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> No problem for patches. Merging into tizen branch makes just things > >>>>>>>> easier (we can compare project manifests, submit diffs etc. easily) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> FYI: to submit multiple packages at the same time on Tizen:Common, > >>>>>>>> please use 'group submissions'. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> See: §3.1.2 on > >>>>>>>> https://source.tizen.org/documentation/developer-guide/getting-started-guide/contributing-code-tizen > >>>>>>>> for guidelines > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> This way, all 'related' packages that depend on each other will > >>>>>>>> rebuild as a whole. If the result is ok (seen in prerelease > >>>>>>>> project), I can accept the submission and bump all packages in the > >>>>>>>> main project. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> Stéphane Desneux > >>>>>>>> Intel OTC - Vannes/FR > >>>>>>>> gpg:1CA35726/DFA9B0232EF80493AF2891FA24E3A2841CA35726 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 29/07/2014 08:39, Boram Park wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Hello José and Stephane. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> [just go to the branch tizen, how?] > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I didn't merge devel/x11 to tizen branch. just created new patch for > >>>>>>>>> tizen branch. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> It seems to make you confused. Actually both branches have exactly > >>>>>>>>> same patch. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> BTW, I'll merge devel/x11 to tizen branch. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> And, I didn't send SRs yet. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I concern that my SRs can be rejected by the maintainer of > >>>>>>>>> Tizen:Common project. my SR will be able to be failed to build > >>>>>>>>> without other my SRs becuase of build dependency. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> So far I saw many reject message becuase of build fail. So we are > >>>>>>>>> going to send SRs after fixing all build-errors in staging project > >>>>>>>>> and merging all our work to tizen branch. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Anyway our all patches have been merged to tizen branch > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> [Diverging that have to be merged] > >>>>>>>>> [Diverging, to be checked] > >>>>>>>>> [Only of our side] > >>>>>>>>> [Crosswalk compiled without scim] > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Above 4 entries seems OK. And gl issue of arm-x11 repo is solved > >>>>>>>>> when I take your patch for SDL and mesa. Thx. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Regards > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Boram > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> ------- *Original Message* ------- > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> *Sender* : Jos� Bollo > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> *Date* : 2014-07-26 01:23 (GMT+09:00) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> *Title* : Re: Re: [Dev] Common/X11 schedule > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Please find here the real final report > >>>>>>>>> BR > >>>>>>>>> josé > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On ven, 2014-07-25 at 18:22 +0200, José Bollo wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> Hello Boram, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I just finished the report (see joined). > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> You will find this entries: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [nothing to do, already at the good revision] > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> The branch tizen is already at the good revision for x11 that is > >>>>>>>>>> already accepted by OBS since long time. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [just go to the branch tizen, how?] > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> The branch tizen is already at the good revision for x11 but was > >>>>>>>>>> never accepted nor submitted, there is a workflow problem. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [Diverging that have to be merged] > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> mesa > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [Diverging, to be checked] > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> SDL > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [Only of our side] > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> libva > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [Crosswalk compiled without scim] > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> crosswalk. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [Bumped on github for upgrading xserver] > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> An effort for upgrading xorg-server to 1.15.99. > >>>>>>>>>> Part of it may be used for bumping to xorg-server 1.16 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Please check with Stephane for further work because I leaving this > >>>>>>>>>> evening for few weeks. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Best regards > >>>>>>>>>> José > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------ > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Boram Park > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Senior engineer > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> E-Mail : [email protected] > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------ > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Boram Park > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Senior engineer > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> E-Mail : [email protected] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>> Dev mailing list > >>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>> https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)<[email protected]> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Dev mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > -- Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
