Hi Carsten, Is Enlightenment 0.18.7 a better candidate ?
It's not the latest one but it's far more recent than the 0.17.4 on tizen git. We took this version because it was quite aligned with EFL 1.9.3 which is the current EFL version on Tizen:Common. With these details, is it still a bad idea ? :) -- Stéphane Desneux Intel OTC - Vannes/FR gpg:1CA35726/DFA9B0232EF80493AF2891FA24E3A2841CA35726 On 30/07/2014 14:37, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:35:39 +0200 Stéphane Desneux > <[email protected]> said: > > bumping to enlightenment upstream is going to be... bad at this stage. hold on > that for the time-being. > >> Hi Boram, >> >> I updated our project with the 4 packages you updated. >> >> 1 new error occured, on xf86-video-intel (which is not up to date probably). >> >> Also, what happens for these remaining packages: >> >> https://github.com/Tarnyko/enlightenment.git tizen >> https://github.com/Tarnyko/xf86-video-intel.git tizen >> https://github.com/Tarnyko/glproto.git >> 5903b304417886de32ad620ff8874998ddee4254 >> >> I think we should still bump them all. Your opinion ? >> >> -- >> Stéphane Desneux >> Intel OTC - Vannes/FR >> gpg:1CA35726/DFA9B0232EF80493AF2891FA24E3A2841CA35726 >> >> On 29/07/2014 14:49, Boram Park wrote: >>> Hello Stephane >>> >>> >>> >>> Today, I upgraded below 4 git repos to rebase xorg-server to 1.16. All >>> patches are pushed in "devel/x11" branch. >>> >>> platform/upstream/xorg-server >>> >>> platform/upstream/xproto >>> >>> platform/upstream/fontsproto >>> >>> platform/upstream/libXfont >>> >>> >>> >>> Please check wethere there are any issues in your side. If no issue, >>> I'll send SRs together when I send SRs of x11 integration work. >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Boram >>> >>> >>> >>> ------- *Original Message* ------- >>> >>> *Sender* : Stéphane Desneux<[email protected]> >>> >>> *Date* : 2014-07-29 16:46 (GMT+09:00) >>> >>> *Title* : Re: [Dev] Common/X11 schedule >>> >>> >>> >>> Boram, >>> >>> No problem for patches. Merging into tizen branch makes just things >>> easier (we can compare project manifests, submit diffs etc. easily) >>> >>> FYI: to submit multiple packages at the same time on Tizen:Common, >>> please use 'group submissions'. >>> >>> See: §3.1.2 on >>> https://source.tizen.org/documentation/developer-guide/getting-started-guide/contributing-code-tizen >>> for guidelines >>> >>> This way, all 'related' packages that depend on each other will rebuild >>> as a whole. If the result is ok (seen in prerelease project), I can >>> accept the submission and bump all packages in the main project. >>> >>> Thanks >>> -- >>> Stéphane Desneux >>> Intel OTC - Vannes/FR >>> gpg:1CA35726/DFA9B0232EF80493AF2891FA24E3A2841CA35726 >>> >>> On 29/07/2014 08:39, Boram Park wrote: >>>> Hello José and Stephane. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [just go to the branch tizen, how?] >>>> >>>> I didn't merge devel/x11 to tizen branch. just created new patch for >>>> tizen branch. >>>> >>>> It seems to make you confused. Actually both branches have exactly same >>>> patch. >>>> >>>> BTW, I'll merge devel/x11 to tizen branch. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> And, I didn't send SRs yet. >>>> >>>> I concern that my SRs can be rejected by the maintainer of Tizen:Common >>>> project. my SR will be able to be failed to build without other my SRs >>>> becuase of build dependency. >>>> >>>> So far I saw many reject message becuase of build fail. So we are going >>>> to send SRs after fixing all build-errors in staging project and merging >>>> all our work to tizen branch. >>>> >>>> Anyway our all patches have been merged to tizen branch >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [Diverging that have to be merged] >>>> [Diverging, to be checked] >>>> [Only of our side] >>>> [Crosswalk compiled without scim] >>>> >>>> Above 4 entries seems OK. And gl issue of arm-x11 repo is solved when I >>>> take your patch for SDL and mesa. Thx. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> Boram >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------- *Original Message* ------- >>>> >>>> *Sender* : Jos� Bollo >>>> >>>> *Date* : 2014-07-26 01:23 (GMT+09:00) >>>> >>>> *Title* : Re: Re: [Dev] Common/X11 schedule >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Please find here the real final report >>>> BR >>>> josé >>>> >>>> On ven, 2014-07-25 at 18:22 +0200, José Bollo wrote: >>>>> Hello Boram, >>>>> >>>>> I just finished the report (see joined). >>>>> >>>>> You will find this entries: >>>>> >>>>> [nothing to do, already at the good revision] >>>>> >>>>> The branch tizen is already at the good revision for x11 that is already >>>>> accepted by OBS since long time. >>>>> >>>>> [just go to the branch tizen, how?] >>>>> >>>>> The branch tizen is already at the good revision for x11 but was never >>>>> accepted nor submitted, there is a workflow problem. >>>>> >>>>> [Diverging that have to be merged] >>>>> >>>>> mesa >>>>> >>>>> [Diverging, to be checked] >>>>> >>>>> SDL >>>>> >>>>> [Only of our side] >>>>> >>>>> libva >>>>> >>>>> [Crosswalk compiled without scim] >>>>> >>>>> crosswalk. >>>>> >>>>> [Bumped on github for upgrading xserver] >>>>> >>>>> An effort for upgrading xorg-server to 1.15.99. >>>>> Part of it may be used for bumping to xorg-server 1.16 >>>>> >>>>> Please check with Stephane for further work because I leaving this >>>>> evening for few weeks. >>>>> >>>>> Best regards >>>>> José >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Boram Park >>>> >>>> Senior engineer >>>> >>>> SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD >>>> >>>> E-Mail : [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Boram Park >>> >>> Senior engineer >>> >>> SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD >>> >>> E-Mail : [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev > > _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
