On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 23:20:16 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[email protected]> said:
on more reflection... tizen common has no hope of dealing with tizen mobile as it stands without lots of work... so maybe it might be best to go to master - you'll get code in a much better state for wayland support. :) > On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:36:39 +0200 Stéphane Desneux > <[email protected]> said: > > > Hi Carsten, > > > > Is Enlightenment 0.18.7 a better candidate ? > > no. e17. as of e18 compositor is no longer a module. this totally kills the > compositor module fork of e's original compositor that was done for e17 and > tizen 2.x - this needs a re-do/design. this also changes how clients/borders > are handled api-wise. > > > It's not the latest one but it's far more recent than the 0.17.4 on > > tizen git. We took this version because it was quite aligned with EFL > > 1.9.3 which is the current EFL version on Tizen:Common. > > > > With these details, is it still a bad idea ? :) > > only if you want to break tizen mobile entirely (as a mobile style ui - apps > will still display - just in windows) - then sure. go for it. then also remove > all the custom samsung e profile packages and config and go back to vanilla > enlightenment - then no problems. :) you definitely then want to nuke the > tizen elementary theme too and go back to vanilla as well. :) if you do this > then may as well go for git master. :) > > > -- > > Stéphane Desneux > > Intel OTC - Vannes/FR > > gpg:1CA35726/DFA9B0232EF80493AF2891FA24E3A2841CA35726 > > > > On 30/07/2014 14:37, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:35:39 +0200 Stéphane Desneux > > > <[email protected]> said: > > > > > > bumping to enlightenment upstream is going to be... bad at this stage. > > > hold on that for the time-being. > > > > > >> Hi Boram, > > >> > > >> I updated our project with the 4 packages you updated. > > >> > > >> 1 new error occured, on xf86-video-intel (which is not up to date > > >> probably). > > >> > > >> Also, what happens for these remaining packages: > > >> > > >> https://github.com/Tarnyko/enlightenment.git tizen > > >> https://github.com/Tarnyko/xf86-video-intel.git tizen > > >> https://github.com/Tarnyko/glproto.git > > >> 5903b304417886de32ad620ff8874998ddee4254 > > >> > > >> I think we should still bump them all. Your opinion ? > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Stéphane Desneux > > >> Intel OTC - Vannes/FR > > >> gpg:1CA35726/DFA9B0232EF80493AF2891FA24E3A2841CA35726 > > >> > > >> On 29/07/2014 14:49, Boram Park wrote: > > >>> Hello Stephane > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Today, I upgraded below 4 git repos to rebase xorg-server to 1.16. All > > >>> patches are pushed in "devel/x11" branch. > > >>> > > >>> platform/upstream/xorg-server > > >>> > > >>> platform/upstream/xproto > > >>> > > >>> platform/upstream/fontsproto > > >>> > > >>> platform/upstream/libXfont > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Please check wethere there are any issues in your side. If no issue, > > >>> I'll send SRs together when I send SRs of x11 integration work. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Regards > > >>> > > >>> Boram > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> ------- *Original Message* ------- > > >>> > > >>> *Sender* : Stéphane Desneux<[email protected]> > > >>> > > >>> *Date* : 2014-07-29 16:46 (GMT+09:00) > > >>> > > >>> *Title* : Re: [Dev] Common/X11 schedule > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Boram, > > >>> > > >>> No problem for patches. Merging into tizen branch makes just things > > >>> easier (we can compare project manifests, submit diffs etc. easily) > > >>> > > >>> FYI: to submit multiple packages at the same time on Tizen:Common, > > >>> please use 'group submissions'. > > >>> > > >>> See: §3.1.2 on > > >>> https://source.tizen.org/documentation/developer-guide/getting-started-guide/contributing-code-tizen > > >>> for guidelines > > >>> > > >>> This way, all 'related' packages that depend on each other will rebuild > > >>> as a whole. If the result is ok (seen in prerelease project), I can > > >>> accept the submission and bump all packages in the main project. > > >>> > > >>> Thanks > > >>> -- > > >>> Stéphane Desneux > > >>> Intel OTC - Vannes/FR > > >>> gpg:1CA35726/DFA9B0232EF80493AF2891FA24E3A2841CA35726 > > >>> > > >>> On 29/07/2014 08:39, Boram Park wrote: > > >>>> Hello José and Stephane. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> [just go to the branch tizen, how?] > > >>>> > > >>>> I didn't merge devel/x11 to tizen branch. just created new patch for > > >>>> tizen branch. > > >>>> > > >>>> It seems to make you confused. Actually both branches have exactly same > > >>>> patch. > > >>>> > > >>>> BTW, I'll merge devel/x11 to tizen branch. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> And, I didn't send SRs yet. > > >>>> > > >>>> I concern that my SRs can be rejected by the maintainer of Tizen:Common > > >>>> project. my SR will be able to be failed to build without other my SRs > > >>>> becuase of build dependency. > > >>>> > > >>>> So far I saw many reject message becuase of build fail. So we are going > > >>>> to send SRs after fixing all build-errors in staging project and > > >>>> merging all our work to tizen branch. > > >>>> > > >>>> Anyway our all patches have been merged to tizen branch > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> [Diverging that have to be merged] > > >>>> [Diverging, to be checked] > > >>>> [Only of our side] > > >>>> [Crosswalk compiled without scim] > > >>>> > > >>>> Above 4 entries seems OK. And gl issue of arm-x11 repo is solved when I > > >>>> take your patch for SDL and mesa. Thx. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Regards > > >>>> > > >>>> Boram > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> ------- *Original Message* ------- > > >>>> > > >>>> *Sender* : Jos� Bollo > > >>>> > > >>>> *Date* : 2014-07-26 01:23 (GMT+09:00) > > >>>> > > >>>> *Title* : Re: Re: [Dev] Common/X11 schedule > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Please find here the real final report > > >>>> BR > > >>>> josé > > >>>> > > >>>> On ven, 2014-07-25 at 18:22 +0200, José Bollo wrote: > > >>>>> Hello Boram, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I just finished the report (see joined). > > >>>>> > > >>>>> You will find this entries: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> [nothing to do, already at the good revision] > > >>>>> > > >>>>> The branch tizen is already at the good revision for x11 that is > > >>>>> already accepted by OBS since long time. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> [just go to the branch tizen, how?] > > >>>>> > > >>>>> The branch tizen is already at the good revision for x11 but was never > > >>>>> accepted nor submitted, there is a workflow problem. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> [Diverging that have to be merged] > > >>>>> > > >>>>> mesa > > >>>>> > > >>>>> [Diverging, to be checked] > > >>>>> > > >>>>> SDL > > >>>>> > > >>>>> [Only of our side] > > >>>>> > > >>>>> libva > > >>>>> > > >>>>> [Crosswalk compiled without scim] > > >>>>> > > >>>>> crosswalk. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> [Bumped on github for upgrading xserver] > > >>>>> > > >>>>> An effort for upgrading xorg-server to 1.15.99. > > >>>>> Part of it may be used for bumping to xorg-server 1.16 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Please check with Stephane for further work because I leaving this > > >>>>> evening for few weeks. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Best regards > > >>>>> José > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> ------------------------------------------ > > >>>> > > >>>> Boram Park > > >>>> > > >>>> Senior engineer > > >>>> > > >>>> SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD > > >>>> > > >>>> E-Mail : [email protected] > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> ------------------------------------------ > > >>> > > >>> Boram Park > > >>> > > >>> Senior engineer > > >>> > > >>> SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD > > >>> > > >>> E-Mail : [email protected] > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Dev mailing list > > >> [email protected] > > >> https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[email protected]> > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev -- Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
