On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:36:39 +0200 Stéphane Desneux <[email protected]> said:
> Hi Carsten, > > Is Enlightenment 0.18.7 a better candidate ? no. e17. as of e18 compositor is no longer a module. this totally kills the compositor module fork of e's original compositor that was done for e17 and tizen 2.x - this needs a re-do/design. this also changes how clients/borders are handled api-wise. > It's not the latest one but it's far more recent than the 0.17.4 on > tizen git. We took this version because it was quite aligned with EFL > 1.9.3 which is the current EFL version on Tizen:Common. > > With these details, is it still a bad idea ? :) only if you want to break tizen mobile entirely (as a mobile style ui - apps will still display - just in windows) - then sure. go for it. then also remove all the custom samsung e profile packages and config and go back to vanilla enlightenment - then no problems. :) you definitely then want to nuke the tizen elementary theme too and go back to vanilla as well. :) if you do this then may as well go for git master. :) > -- > Stéphane Desneux > Intel OTC - Vannes/FR > gpg:1CA35726/DFA9B0232EF80493AF2891FA24E3A2841CA35726 > > On 30/07/2014 14:37, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:35:39 +0200 Stéphane Desneux > > <[email protected]> said: > > > > bumping to enlightenment upstream is going to be... bad at this stage. hold > > on that for the time-being. > > > >> Hi Boram, > >> > >> I updated our project with the 4 packages you updated. > >> > >> 1 new error occured, on xf86-video-intel (which is not up to date > >> probably). > >> > >> Also, what happens for these remaining packages: > >> > >> https://github.com/Tarnyko/enlightenment.git tizen > >> https://github.com/Tarnyko/xf86-video-intel.git tizen > >> https://github.com/Tarnyko/glproto.git > >> 5903b304417886de32ad620ff8874998ddee4254 > >> > >> I think we should still bump them all. Your opinion ? > >> > >> -- > >> Stéphane Desneux > >> Intel OTC - Vannes/FR > >> gpg:1CA35726/DFA9B0232EF80493AF2891FA24E3A2841CA35726 > >> > >> On 29/07/2014 14:49, Boram Park wrote: > >>> Hello Stephane > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Today, I upgraded below 4 git repos to rebase xorg-server to 1.16. All > >>> patches are pushed in "devel/x11" branch. > >>> > >>> platform/upstream/xorg-server > >>> > >>> platform/upstream/xproto > >>> > >>> platform/upstream/fontsproto > >>> > >>> platform/upstream/libXfont > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Please check wethere there are any issues in your side. If no issue, > >>> I'll send SRs together when I send SRs of x11 integration work. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> > >>> Boram > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ------- *Original Message* ------- > >>> > >>> *Sender* : Stéphane Desneux<[email protected]> > >>> > >>> *Date* : 2014-07-29 16:46 (GMT+09:00) > >>> > >>> *Title* : Re: [Dev] Common/X11 schedule > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Boram, > >>> > >>> No problem for patches. Merging into tizen branch makes just things > >>> easier (we can compare project manifests, submit diffs etc. easily) > >>> > >>> FYI: to submit multiple packages at the same time on Tizen:Common, > >>> please use 'group submissions'. > >>> > >>> See: §3.1.2 on > >>> https://source.tizen.org/documentation/developer-guide/getting-started-guide/contributing-code-tizen > >>> for guidelines > >>> > >>> This way, all 'related' packages that depend on each other will rebuild > >>> as a whole. If the result is ok (seen in prerelease project), I can > >>> accept the submission and bump all packages in the main project. > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> -- > >>> Stéphane Desneux > >>> Intel OTC - Vannes/FR > >>> gpg:1CA35726/DFA9B0232EF80493AF2891FA24E3A2841CA35726 > >>> > >>> On 29/07/2014 08:39, Boram Park wrote: > >>>> Hello José and Stephane. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> [just go to the branch tizen, how?] > >>>> > >>>> I didn't merge devel/x11 to tizen branch. just created new patch for > >>>> tizen branch. > >>>> > >>>> It seems to make you confused. Actually both branches have exactly same > >>>> patch. > >>>> > >>>> BTW, I'll merge devel/x11 to tizen branch. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> And, I didn't send SRs yet. > >>>> > >>>> I concern that my SRs can be rejected by the maintainer of Tizen:Common > >>>> project. my SR will be able to be failed to build without other my SRs > >>>> becuase of build dependency. > >>>> > >>>> So far I saw many reject message becuase of build fail. So we are going > >>>> to send SRs after fixing all build-errors in staging project and merging > >>>> all our work to tizen branch. > >>>> > >>>> Anyway our all patches have been merged to tizen branch > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> [Diverging that have to be merged] > >>>> [Diverging, to be checked] > >>>> [Only of our side] > >>>> [Crosswalk compiled without scim] > >>>> > >>>> Above 4 entries seems OK. And gl issue of arm-x11 repo is solved when I > >>>> take your patch for SDL and mesa. Thx. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Regards > >>>> > >>>> Boram > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> ------- *Original Message* ------- > >>>> > >>>> *Sender* : Jos� Bollo > >>>> > >>>> *Date* : 2014-07-26 01:23 (GMT+09:00) > >>>> > >>>> *Title* : Re: Re: [Dev] Common/X11 schedule > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Please find here the real final report > >>>> BR > >>>> josé > >>>> > >>>> On ven, 2014-07-25 at 18:22 +0200, José Bollo wrote: > >>>>> Hello Boram, > >>>>> > >>>>> I just finished the report (see joined). > >>>>> > >>>>> You will find this entries: > >>>>> > >>>>> [nothing to do, already at the good revision] > >>>>> > >>>>> The branch tizen is already at the good revision for x11 that is already > >>>>> accepted by OBS since long time. > >>>>> > >>>>> [just go to the branch tizen, how?] > >>>>> > >>>>> The branch tizen is already at the good revision for x11 but was never > >>>>> accepted nor submitted, there is a workflow problem. > >>>>> > >>>>> [Diverging that have to be merged] > >>>>> > >>>>> mesa > >>>>> > >>>>> [Diverging, to be checked] > >>>>> > >>>>> SDL > >>>>> > >>>>> [Only of our side] > >>>>> > >>>>> libva > >>>>> > >>>>> [Crosswalk compiled without scim] > >>>>> > >>>>> crosswalk. > >>>>> > >>>>> [Bumped on github for upgrading xserver] > >>>>> > >>>>> An effort for upgrading xorg-server to 1.15.99. > >>>>> Part of it may be used for bumping to xorg-server 1.16 > >>>>> > >>>>> Please check with Stephane for further work because I leaving this > >>>>> evening for few weeks. > >>>>> > >>>>> Best regards > >>>>> José > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> ------------------------------------------ > >>>> > >>>> Boram Park > >>>> > >>>> Senior engineer > >>>> > >>>> SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD > >>>> > >>>> E-Mail : [email protected] > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ------------------------------------------ > >>> > >>> Boram Park > >>> > >>> Senior engineer > >>> > >>> SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD > >>> > >>> E-Mail : [email protected] > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Dev mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev > > > > > -- Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
