Looks like we forgot an htaccess redirect here:
http://logging.apache.org/log4j-audit/

On 18 June 2018 at 03:32, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It’s the one called logo.jpg.
> All png logo files are our modified versions AFAICS.
>
>
> > On Jun 18, 2018, at 13:08, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I’m OK with that, assuming I can remember which one it was.
> >
> > Ralph
> >
> >> On Jun 17, 2018, at 3:53 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> About the logo: I would prefer that everywhere we use it we stick to
> the Log4j 2 logo as it was designed and not change the colors or pattern
> any more.
> >>
> >> The original looks much more clean and professional.
> >>
> >>> On Jun 18, 2018, at 2:06, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks Matt!
> >>>
> >>> Any help you want to provide would of course be welcome! If you have
> ideas on how to improve the documentation please go for it!
> >>>
> >>> As for the Log4j logo, I didn’t see any reason not to use it and
> didn’t really want to spend the time creating a new one.
> >>>
> >>> Ralph
> >>>
> >>>> On Jun 17, 2018, at 9:23 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>> Notes:
> >>>>
> >>>> * The git checkout command only worked for me without the "tags/"
> prefix to
> >>>> the tag name, not sure why.
> >>>> * If you change the wget command to use --cut-dirs=5, you can use the
> same
> >>>> command with the dist.a.o URL, pretty handy for verifying the
> artifacts
> >>>> * I recently discovered you can use gpg --verify-files to verify
> multiple
> >>>> files in a single command, so a helper for that would be "find . -name
> >>>> '*.asc' | gpg --verify-files". This might be worth noting on our
> download
> >>>> pages.
> >>>> * After our recent conversation about other uses for audit logging,
> I'm
> >>>> interesting in writing a blog post on how to use this with something
> like
> >>>> Zipkin.
> >>>>
> >>>> Site notes:
> >>>> * Home page title is wrong. It has an errant "Log4j_Audit" in it.
> >>>> * Do we want to reuse the Log4j 2 logo here?
> >>>> * Something looks off in the getting started page for code formatting.
> >>>> * A similar issue I have with the main Log4j site: it would be nice if
> >>>> references to class names were linked to their javadoc pages. This
> might be
> >>>> easier to do with asciidoc since it has better macros than velocity.
> >>>> * Your examples make me envy your production logs. They must be
> rather well
> >>>> organized!
> >>>> * It'd be nice to migrate the docs to asciidoc in the future. I can
> handle
> >>>> that conversion if you want (though it'd be after the release work I
> have
> >>>> queued).
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>



-- 
Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to