Good catch with the announcement. I've already started proposing projects
around this: <
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jenkinsci-dev/MCN7x4KSWes>

On 21 June 2018 at 10:21, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote:

> I also have to send the announcement.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Jun 21, 2018, at 8:21 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > OK, thanks. If you have time to fix these please do. Otherwise I will
> get to it tonight or over the weekend.
> >
> > Ralph
> >
> >> On Jun 21, 2018, at 8:12 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Also just noticed the "getting started" link in the intro paragraph is a
> >> dead link. The sidebar link is correct, though.
> >>
> >> On 21 June 2018 at 10:11, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Looks like we forgot an htaccess redirect here: http://logging.apache.
> >>> org/log4j-audit/
> >>>
> >>> On 18 June 2018 at 03:32, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> It’s the one called logo.jpg.
> >>>> All png logo files are our modified versions AFAICS.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Jun 18, 2018, at 13:08, Ralph Goers <[email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I’m OK with that, assuming I can remember which one it was.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ralph
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Jun 17, 2018, at 3:53 PM, Remko Popma <[email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> About the logo: I would prefer that everywhere we use it we stick to
> >>>> the Log4j 2 logo as it was designed and not change the colors or
> pattern
> >>>> any more.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The original looks much more clean and professional.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Jun 18, 2018, at 2:06, Ralph Goers <[email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks Matt!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Any help you want to provide would of course be welcome! If you
> have
> >>>> ideas on how to improve the documentation please go for it!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> As for the Log4j logo, I didn’t see any reason not to use it and
> >>>> didn’t really want to spend the time creating a new one.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Ralph
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Jun 17, 2018, at 9:23 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Notes:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> * The git checkout command only worked for me without the "tags/"
> >>>> prefix to
> >>>>>>>> the tag name, not sure why.
> >>>>>>>> * If you change the wget command to use --cut-dirs=5, you can use
> >>>> the same
> >>>>>>>> command with the dist.a.o URL, pretty handy for verifying the
> >>>> artifacts
> >>>>>>>> * I recently discovered you can use gpg --verify-files to verify
> >>>> multiple
> >>>>>>>> files in a single command, so a helper for that would be "find .
> >>>> -name
> >>>>>>>> '*.asc' | gpg --verify-files". This might be worth noting on our
> >>>> download
> >>>>>>>> pages.
> >>>>>>>> * After our recent conversation about other uses for audit
> logging,
> >>>> I'm
> >>>>>>>> interesting in writing a blog post on how to use this with
> something
> >>>> like
> >>>>>>>> Zipkin.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Site notes:
> >>>>>>>> * Home page title is wrong. It has an errant "Log4j_Audit" in it.
> >>>>>>>> * Do we want to reuse the Log4j 2 logo here?
> >>>>>>>> * Something looks off in the getting started page for code
> >>>> formatting.
> >>>>>>>> * A similar issue I have with the main Log4j site: it would be
> nice
> >>>> if
> >>>>>>>> references to class names were linked to their javadoc pages. This
> >>>> might be
> >>>>>>>> easier to do with asciidoc since it has better macros than
> velocity.
> >>>>>>>> * Your examples make me envy your production logs. They must be
> >>>> rather well
> >>>>>>>> organized!
> >>>>>>>> * It'd be nice to migrate the docs to asciidoc in the future. I
> can
> >>>> handle
> >>>>>>>> that conversion if you want (though it'd be after the release
> work I
> >>>> have
> >>>>>>>> queued).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >
>
>
>


-- 
Matt Sicker <[email protected]>

Reply via email to