On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Shay, I forwarded your idea to the -dev list. > > Personally I think this is a great idea, really whenever there is a > even a remote possibility of an index corruption, and we fix it, I > think we should aggressively issue a release. > +1 > > We also have some important bugfixes to things like NumericRangeQuery. > > I'll sign up to do it, unless Uwe has the time and prefers to (since > he has mastered the art of cranking these 2.9.x/3.0.x things out, and > it would be my first time/take me longer). > > What do you guys think? > +1 for release! > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Shay Banon <kim...@gmail.com> > Date: Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:59 PM > Subject: Lucene 3.0.3 Release Date > To: java-u...@lucene.apache.org > > > Hi, > > It seems like current 3.0 branch has accumulated some important bug > fixes, especially the possible index corruption bug. Is there a date for a > formal 3.0.3 release? > > -shay.banon > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
