On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Tim Smith <tsm...@attivio.com> wrote:
>  I suggest backporting lucene-2328 as well
>
> the memory leak grows based on the number of commits
> if you are doing extremely frequent commits, the memory leak becomes a
> sizable loss that cannot be reclaimed without restarting and may require
> restarting the vm on a daily basis
>
>  -- Tim
>

but at the same time, as mike said, not only is the patch large (and
risky) but it also involves backwards/API breaks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to