Will do it! I just want to get this 2.9 can read 3.0 indexes in :-) Uwe
----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: [email protected] > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Muir [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 12:18 AM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Fwd: Lucene 3.0.3 Release Date > > Shay, I forwarded your idea to the -dev list. > > Personally I think this is a great idea, really whenever there is a even a > remote > possibility of an index corruption, and we fix it, I think we should > aggressively > issue a release. > > We also have some important bugfixes to things like NumericRangeQuery. > > I'll sign up to do it, unless Uwe has the time and prefers to (since he has > mastered the art of cranking these 2.9.x/3.0.x things out, and it would be my > first time/take me longer). > > What do you guys think? > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Shay Banon <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:59 PM > Subject: Lucene 3.0.3 Release Date > To: [email protected] > > > Hi, > > It seems like current 3.0 branch has accumulated some important bug fixes, > especially the possible index corruption bug. Is there a date for a formal > 3.0.3 > release? > > -shay.banon > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional > commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
