[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14067964#comment-14067964
 ] 

Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-6260:
------------------------------------

In fact I'd love to see DUH2 / SolrCoreState  and related code refactored and 
cleaned up.  But back compat is not holding us back... the difficulty there is 
correctness I think.  This has to do with the type of code it is.  For example, 
refactoring & changing a faceting/search method is easy - it's deterministic 
without a lot of threading/concurrency concerns and we have random tests for 
correctness.

> Rename DirectUpdateHandler2
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-6260
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6260
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 5.0
>            Reporter: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: SOLR-6260.patch, SOLR-6260.patch
>
>
> "DirectUpdateHandler" was removed, I think in Solr 4. DirectUpdateHandler2 
> should be renamed, at least remove that "2". I don't know really what 
> "direct" means here. Maybe it could be renamed to "DefaultUpdateHandler", or 
> "UpdateHandlerDefaultImpl", or other good suggestions



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to