I'm ok with moving to Java 8, although realistically I don't think it's that much of a gain (yes, there are some syntactic sugars and new APIs, but I remain pretty conservative about using them).
D. On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Chris Hostetter > <hossman_luc...@fucit.org> wrote: >> >> b) that your argument against benson's claims seemed missleading: just >> because Oracle is EOLing doesn't mean people won't be using OpenJDK; even >> if they are using Oracle's JDK, if they are large comercial organizations >> they might pay oracle to keep using it for a long time. >> > > Its not misleading at all, its being practical. If people want to use > old jvm versions, good for them. But if they open a corruption bug > with one of these "commercial" versions, then my only choice is to > close as "wont fix". So they might as well just use an old lucene > version, too. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
