[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14323044#comment-14323044
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-6247:
-------------------------------------
{quote}
Both camps are in favor of smaller downloads I am sure, but not being explicit
about it is what's muddling the discussion.
{quote}
Who is not being explicit? I was explicit when i said what i wanted to do for
lucene, its right here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6247?focusedCommentId=14321419&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14321419
I'm being explicit, thats not the problem. I think the problem is that you
aren't listening.
> artifacts are half a gigabyte
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-6247
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6247
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 5.0
>
>
> This is a growing problem and now, its spun out of control.
> The latest release artifacts are half a gigabyte. sorry, I am against adding
> more retries to the smoke tester and continuing down the same path
> (LUCENE-6231).
> Instead I open this blocker issue to discuss fixing this. Whenever i tried to
> fix it before (e.g. removing zips), people complained at me "what are you
> trying to fix" and wouldn't let me minimize it in the slightest.
> Now the problem is clear, we have a blocker issue to discuss it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
