On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On Jan 18, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > >> I can't help but remind myself, this is the same argument Oracle >> offered up for the whole reason hudson debacle >> (http://hudson-labs.org/content/whos-driving-thing) >> >> Declaring that I have a secret pocket of users that want XYZ isn't >> open source consensus. > > > > You were very quick to cite your own secret pocket of users when you called > those who support it the "vocal minority". So, if you want to continue > baiting the discussion we can, but as I see it, we have committers willing to > support it, so what's the big deal?
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/474564645f673fbb/discussion_about_release_frequency You can look there, and see the responses of several other committers about maven. I think i like Yonik's comment best: Maven is not a part of the release process, if you think it should be, maybe you should call a vote? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
