Why not vote for or against 'maven artifacts'? http://www.doodle.com/2qp35b42vstivhvx
I'm using lucene+solr a lot times via maven. Elasticsearch uses lucene via gradle. Solandra uses lucene via ivy and so on ;) So maven artifacts are not only very handy for maven folks. But I think no artifacts would be better than broken ones. Why not trying to 'switch' to ivy build system? It's ant but handles dependencies better IMO. Regards, Peter. > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> On Jan 18, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Robert Muir wrote: >> >>> I can't help but remind myself, this is the same argument Oracle >>> offered up for the whole reason hudson debacle >>> (http://hudson-labs.org/content/whos-driving-thing) >>> >>> Declaring that I have a secret pocket of users that want XYZ isn't >>> open source consensus. >> >> >> You were very quick to cite your own secret pocket of users when you called >> those who support it the "vocal minority". So, if you want to continue >> baiting the discussion we can, but as I see it, we have committers willing >> to support it, so what's the big deal? > I don't think they are that secret, you can look at the last maven > discussion and see several other committers who spoke up against it. > they are just sick of the discussion i gather and have given up > fighting it. > > The problem again, is the magical special artifacts. > > I dont see consensus here for maven... when you have it, get back to me. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
