On Jan 18, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: > >> It's just software and we have people willing to maintain the Maven stuff. >> I simply don't get what the big deal is in keeping something that people >> find useful and has (enough) committer support. > > Why not call a committer vote then? > > [] <-- maintain maven ourselves instead of working on search features, > and slower releases.
Wow, so having Maven releases is why we take 6-10 months to release? Give me a break. The only thing that is slower (arguably) is the building of the release itself. We have had Maven support for a long time and it has never been brought up until you did that it was the cause. The cause is, was and always will be that we innovate at a pretty rapid pace and always have the mindset to get "just one more" set of features/fixes into the next release. > [] <-- let others maintain maven downstream, instead we work on search > features, and faster releases. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
