On Jan 18, 2011, at 3:55 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >> On Jan 18, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Robert Muir wrote: >> >>> I can't help but remind myself, this is the same argument Oracle >>> offered up for the whole reason hudson debacle >>> (http://hudson-labs.org/content/whos-driving-thing) >>> >>> Declaring that I have a secret pocket of users that want XYZ isn't >>> open source consensus. >> >> >> >> You were very quick to cite your own secret pocket of users when you called >> those who support it the "vocal minority". So, if you want to continue >> baiting the discussion we can, but as I see it, we have committers willing >> to support it, so what's the big deal? > > I don't think they are that secret, you can look at the last maven > discussion and see several other committers who spoke up against it. > they are just sick of the discussion i gather and have given up > fighting it. Wow, so who is the vocal minority now? > > The problem again, is the magical special artifacts. > > I dont see consensus here for maven... when you have it, get back to me. As I see, it you have you, Shai and Miller (and Yonik, likely from the last go around). On the Maven side, you have me, Steve, McKinley and Busch, plus some users/contributors. In other words, I don't see consensus for dropping it. When you have it, get back to me. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
