I've just generated the first RC, but haven't posted it. How long do you
expect it to take to get this bug resolved? It does seem worth doing.

Upayavira

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015, at 09:51 AM, Varun Thacker wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I think we should try to fix SOLR-8363 before the RC?
>
> Seems like this problem has been there for a while since the
> luceneMatchVersion hasn't updated in a while. So if others feel this
> isn't worth the delay then I'll remove it from being a blocker.
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Adrien Grand
> <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been
>> committed to the 5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find
>> problems before Upayavira cuts a release candidate.
>>
>> Le jeu. 3 déc. 2015 à 03:34, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> a
>> écrit :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and
>>> running tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
>>>>
pointing at the 5.4 branch.
>>>>
>>>>
Upayavira
>>>>
>>>>
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>>>>
> thx :-)
>>>>
>
>>>>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
>>>>
> > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch
> > creation
>>>>
> > mail
>>>>
> >
>>>>
> >
>>>>
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>>>>
> > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one
> > > already
>>>>
> > >
>>>>
> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson
> > > <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
> > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US,
> > >> lots of
>>>>
> > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be
> > >> surprised if
>>>>
> > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
>>>>
> > >>
>>>>
> > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter
> > >> <thelabd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
> > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
>>>>
> > >>>
>>>>
> > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk>
> > >>> wrote:
>>>>
> > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
>>>>
> > >>>>
>>>>
> > >>>> Upayavira
>>>>
> > >>>>
>>>>
> > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
>>>>
> > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101
> > >>>>> into
>>>>
> > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if
> > >>>>>      there are
>>>>
> > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
>>>>
> > >>>>>
>>>>
> > >>>>> Tim
>>>>
> > >>>>>
>>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk>
> > >>>>> wrote:
>>>>
> > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this
> > >>>>> > moment, the feature
>>>>
> > >>>>> > freeze starts.
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix
> > >>>>> > version 5.4. I
>>>>
> > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I
> > >>>>> > expect that the
>>>>
> > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five
> > >>>>> > tickets:
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham,
> > >>>>> > Noble) blocker
>>>>
> > >>>>> >"Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
> > >>>>> >authorization causes
>>>>
> > >>>>> > issue with replication"
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> >Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before
> > >>>>> >the release?
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik)
> > >>>>> > critical
>>>>
> > >>>>> >"Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> >This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik)
> > >>>>> > critical
>>>>
> > >>>>> >"Add tests for bin/post"
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> >Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of
> > >>>>> >holding back a
>>>>
> > >>>>> > release
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe)
> > >>>>> > critical
>>>>
> > >>>>> >"Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java
> > >>>>> >9 (b71)"
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> >Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin,
> > >>>>> > others), blocker
>>>>
> > >>>>> >"Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> >Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I
> > >>>>> >will not
>>>>
> > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> >- o -
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of
> > >>>>> > attention. Anyone
>>>>
> > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > Upayavira
>>>>
> > >>>>>
>>>>
> > >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> -------
>>>>
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > >>>>>
>>>>
> > >>>>
>>>>
> > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> ------
>>>>
> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > >>>>
>>>>
> > >>>
>>>>
> > >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> -----
>>>>
> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > >>>
>>>>
> > >>
>>>>
> > >> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> ----
>>>>
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > >>
>>>>
> > >
>>>>
> > >
>>>>
> > >
>>>>
> > > --
>>>>
> > > -----------------------------------------------------
>>>>
> > > Noble Paul
>>>>
> >
>>>>
> >
>>>>
> >
>>>>
> > --
>>>>
> > -----------------------------------------------------
>>>>
> > Noble Paul
>>>>
> >
>>>>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------
>>>>
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> >
>>>>
>
>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>
>>>>
>>>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Anshum Gupta
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Regards, Varun Thacker

Reply via email to