Hi Everyone, I think we should try to fix SOLR-8363 before the RC?
Seems like this problem has been there for a while since the luceneMatchVersion hasn't updated in a while. So if others feel this isn't worth the delay then I'll remove it from being a blocker. On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: > SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been committed > to the 5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find problems before > Upayavira cuts a release candidate. > > Le jeu. 3 déc. 2015 à 03:34, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> a > écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and running >> tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in. >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: >> >>> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins >>> pointing at the 5.4 branch. >>> >>> Upayavira >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote: >>> > thx :-) >>> > >>> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote: >>> > > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch creation >>> > > mail >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one >>> already >>> > > > >>> > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson < >>> erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US, >>> lots of >>> > > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised >>> if >>> > > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;) >>> > > >> >>> > > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter < >>> thelabd...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks! >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> >>> wrote: >>> > > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4. >>> > > >>>> >>> > > >>>> Upayavira >>> > > >>>> >>> > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote: >>> > > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101 >>> into >>> > > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if >>> there are >>> > > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch >>> > > >>>>> >>> > > >>>>> Tim >>> > > >>>>> >>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> >>> wrote: >>> > > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this >>> moment, the feature >>> > > >>>>> > freeze starts. >>> > > >>>>> > >>> > > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix >>> version 5.4. I >>> > > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I >>> expect that the >>> > > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5. >>> > > >>>>> > >>> > > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets: >>> > > >>>>> > >>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, >>> Noble) blocker >>> > > >>>>> > "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased >>> authorization causes >>> > > >>>>> > issue with replication" >>> > > >>>>> > >>> > > >>>>> > Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before >>> the release? >>> > > >>>>> > >>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) >>> critical >>> > > >>>>> > "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp" >>> > > >>>>> > >>> > > >>>>> > This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense. >>> > > >>>>> > >>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) >>> critical >>> > > >>>>> > "Add tests for bin/post" >>> > > >>>>> > >>> > > >>>>> > Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of >>> holding back a >>> > > >>>>> > release >>> > > >>>>> > >>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) >>> critical >>> > > >>>>> > "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and >>> java 9 (b71)" >>> > > >>>>> > >>> > > >>>>> > Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a >>> blocker? >>> > > >>>>> > >>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, >>> others), blocker >>> > > >>>>> > "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x" >>> > > >>>>> > >>> > > >>>>> > Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so >>> I will not >>> > > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either. >>> > > >>>>> > >>> > > >>>>> > - o - >>> > > >>>>> > >>> > > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of >>> attention. Anyone >>> > > >>>>> > have comments/observations here? >>> > > >>>>> > >>> > > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly. >>> > > >>>>> > >>> > > >>>>> > Upayavira >>> > > >>>>> >>> > > >>>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> > > >>>>> >>> > > >>>> >>> > > >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> > > >>>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> > > >>> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> > > >> >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > -- >>> > > > ----------------------------------------------------- >>> > > > Noble Paul >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > ----------------------------------------------------- >>> > > Noble Paul >>> > > >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> > > >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> > >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Anshum Gupta >> > -- Regards, Varun Thacker
