> its fine to have some higher-level class to support this crap, but it > shouldnt be some transparent searcher.
I'll create a patch and post to a Jira. On a side note, for multi threaded calls I noticed there's a lock on the PQ in IndexSearcher, is the performance of that OK? On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Jason Rutherglen > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think we only need to resurrect the merge score/field-docs code, in >> it's own class. Eg, each sub-node is expected to create it's own >> score/field-docs, then the merge code is centralized. >> >>> Maybe we should bring back the 'merge results' part of multi searcher >>> without the query rewrite. >> >> This is how Solr works today. >> > > no its not, the problem with multisearcher was it was too low of a level. > > its fine to have some higher-level class to support this crap, but it > shouldnt be some transparent searcher. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
