[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13105887#comment-13105887
 ] 

Dawid Weiss commented on SOLR-2762:
-----------------------------------

I will review it later today. The code is based on several assumptions to speed 
things up (for example it assumes the fst yields sorted output). I will try to 
write a failing test case first. 

@cyclomatic complexity: the conditions inside loops are meant to 
early-interrupt the search. That's where the gain is and it'll be hard to get 
rid of in a clean way.

@min(10, num): I typically try to avoid overallocating buffers; if somebody 
requests > 10 matches (unlikely?) then we will gracefully expand the buffers as 
we go. Also: the point of doing this is so that somebody could request _all_ 
matches by passing Integer.MAX_VALUE which would otherwise cause an OOM.

> FSTLookup returns one less suggestion than it should when onlyMorePopular=true
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-2762
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2762
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: spellchecker
>    Affects Versions: 3.3
>            Reporter: David Smiley
>            Assignee: Dawid Weiss
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: SOLR-2762_FSTLookup_off_by_one.patch
>
>
> I'm using the Suggester.  When I switched from TSTLookup to FSTLookup, I 
> noticed that it returned one fewer suggestion than what I asked for. I have 
> spellcheck.onlyMorePopular=true; when I set it to false, I see the correct 
> count. Another aspect of the bug is that this off-by-one bug only seems to 
> occur when my suggestion has an exact match.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to