Do we gain much from such a requirement? Are there APIs that make things run faster or perform better?
The downside for me is that if Lucene requires Java 17 then all downstream projects will be forced to require Java 17. And Java 11 LTS is still perfectly fine and supported. So unless there is a gain, I wouldn't force folks to upgrade. Dawid On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 3:50 PM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Now that the main branch is the future 10.0 version, would there be any > concern if we bumped the minimum Java version to 17 instead of 11? > > -- > Adrien >
