Who would we be forcing to upgrade? It is the 'main' branch: unreleased. +1 to bump to 17
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 11:19 AM Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Do we gain much from such a requirement? Are there APIs that make things run > faster or perform better? > > The downside for me is that if Lucene requires Java 17 then all downstream > projects will be forced to require Java 17. And Java 11 LTS is still > perfectly fine and supported. So unless there is a gain, I wouldn't force > folks to upgrade. > > Dawid > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 3:50 PM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> Now that the main branch is the future 10.0 version, would there be any >> concern if we bumped the minimum Java version to 17 instead of 11? >> >> -- >> Adrien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
