I think we should wait for these two changes. I also think we should add automatic bundle names to all JARs starting with 9.0. Even if they're not proper modules yet, it'd clarify what the module names would be for all of the 9x line. I think a short name of lucene.* is sufficient (we don't need to prefix with org.apache.lucene) so that we have modules like lucene.core, lucene.analysis.kuromoji, etc. I can add this - already have a local patch that does it and enables Luke to become a first-class module, for example.
Dawid On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 8:49 PM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I plan to build a RC for Lucene 9.0 in the next few days. > > We don't have blockers left, but there are two faceting changes that look > like we could save some backward compatibility logic in 10.x by folding them > into 9.0: > - LUCENE-10062: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/264 > - LUCENE-10122: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/420 > > I'm interested in thoughts regarding whether I should wait for these changes. > > -- > Adrien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
