Thanks Dawid. @Greg Miller <[email protected]> What do you think about getting these two PRs in for 9.0?
On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 9:25 AM Dawid Weiss <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we should wait for these two changes. > > I also think we should add automatic bundle names to all JARs starting > with 9.0. Even if they're not proper modules yet, it'd clarify what > the module names would be for all of the 9x line. I think a short name > of lucene.* is sufficient (we don't need to prefix with > org.apache.lucene) so that we have modules like lucene.core, > lucene.analysis.kuromoji, etc. I can add this - already have a local > patch that does it and enables Luke to become a first-class module, > for example. > > Dawid > > On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 8:49 PM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I plan to build a RC for Lucene 9.0 in the next few days. > > > > We don't have blockers left, but there are two faceting changes that > look like we could save some backward compatibility logic in 10.x by > folding them into 9.0: > > - LUCENE-10062: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/264 > > - LUCENE-10122: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/420 > > > > I'm interested in thoughts regarding whether I should wait for these > changes. > > > > -- > > Adrien > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Adrien
