+1, yeah let's see if we can get these in. It would be nice to not carry the back-compat logic into 10. I'll prioritize these today/tomorrow; I think we should be able to turn them around pretty quickly. I'll update on this thread when PRs have been merged.
Cheers, -Greg On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 6:20 AM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks Dawid. > > @Greg Miller What do you think about getting these two PRs in for 9.0? > > On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 9:25 AM Dawid Weiss <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I think we should wait for these two changes. >> >> I also think we should add automatic bundle names to all JARs starting >> with 9.0. Even if they're not proper modules yet, it'd clarify what >> the module names would be for all of the 9x line. I think a short name >> of lucene.* is sufficient (we don't need to prefix with >> org.apache.lucene) so that we have modules like lucene.core, >> lucene.analysis.kuromoji, etc. I can add this - already have a local >> patch that does it and enables Luke to become a first-class module, >> for example. >> >> Dawid >> >> On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 8:49 PM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Hello, >> > >> > I plan to build a RC for Lucene 9.0 in the next few days. >> > >> > We don't have blockers left, but there are two faceting changes that look >> > like we could save some backward compatibility logic in 10.x by folding >> > them into 9.0: >> > - LUCENE-10062: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/264 >> > - LUCENE-10122: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/420 >> > >> > I'm interested in thoughts regarding whether I should wait for these >> > changes. >> > >> > -- >> > Adrien >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > -- > Adrien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
