Thanks Greg!

On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 6:09 PM Greg Miller <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1, yeah let's see if we can get these in. It would be nice to not
> carry the back-compat logic into 10. I'll prioritize these
> today/tomorrow; I think we should be able to turn them around pretty
> quickly. I'll update on this thread when PRs have been merged.
>
> Cheers,
> -Greg
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 6:20 AM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Dawid.
> >
> > @Greg Miller What do you think about getting these two PRs in for 9.0?
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 9:25 AM Dawid Weiss <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I think we should wait for these two changes.
> >>
> >> I also think we should add automatic bundle names to all JARs starting
> >> with 9.0. Even if they're not proper modules yet, it'd clarify what
> >> the module names would be for all of the 9x line. I think a short name
> >> of lucene.* is sufficient (we don't need to prefix with
> >> org.apache.lucene) so that we have modules like lucene.core,
> >> lucene.analysis.kuromoji, etc.  I can add this - already have a local
> >> patch that does it and enables Luke to become a first-class module,
> >> for example.
> >>
> >> Dawid
> >>
> >> On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 8:49 PM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > I plan to build a RC for Lucene 9.0 in the next few days.
> >> >
> >> > We don't have blockers left, but there are two faceting changes that
> look like we could save some backward compatibility logic in 10.x by
> folding them into 9.0:
> >> >  - LUCENE-10062: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/264
> >> >  - LUCENE-10122: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/420
> >> >
> >> > I'm interested in thoughts regarding whether I should wait for these
> changes.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Adrien
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Adrien
>


-- 
Adrien

Reply via email to