hi,

If we are going to respin I would like to consider this PR
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13877 which is a forward port of
a change we did in 9.11.1 which has arised after we reverted
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13857. The change is
straightforward so I don't think there is any risk here.

Thanks,

Ignacio

On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 9:37 AM Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> If we're respinning, can I also add this to the release branch?
>
> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13825
>
> This change affects the API of DataInput, which is an important core 
> interface, but it does have a strong rationale for people who use these 
> classes directly in downstream libraries.
>
> I'll apply this change to branch_10x right now - without touching the release 
> branch.
>
> Dawid
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 3:47 AM Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com> 
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Alas, I fear this issue is likely a (late breaking!) blocker for 10.0.0?
>>
>>     https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13867
>>
>> I (sadly) broke back compat in 9.12.0 when trying to open 9.11.x written 
>> indices using HNSW scalar quantization at defaults.  I have not tested but I 
>> strongly expect the current 10.0.0 RC to also have broken reading 9.11.x 
>> written indices (with HNSW scalar quantization) too.  Thank you to Ionut 
>> Anghelcovici Lucene user for catching this and opening a well-written issue.
>>
>> I'm first (now) trying to understand why our BWC tests are not catching 
>> this...
>>
>> Separately, this at least (sigh) shows the benefits of releasing 9.last 
>> before 10.0!  Sorry about all of this!!
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 12:26 PM Patrick Zhai <zhai7...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>> SUCCESS! [1:08:46.194765]
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 7:31 AM Benjamin Trent <ben.w.tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:48:25.853452]
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 8:31 AM Stefan Vodita <stefan.vod...@gmail.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > +1 SUCCESS! [0:40:01.995275]
>>>> >
>>>> > On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 at 11:36, Luca Cavanna <java...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene 10.0.0
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I published a draft of the release notes at 
>>>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 
>>>> >> . Feedback is welcome. Feel free to edit directly.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC3-rev-a4c0f741ccc5e5b86fc82fae150561c0b05a1dca
>>>> >>
>>>> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC3-rev-a4c0f741ccc5e5b86fc82fae150561c0b05a1dca
>>>> >>
>>>> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2024-10-09 17:00 
>>>> >> UTC.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> [ ] +1  approve
>>>> >> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>> >> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Here is my +1
>>>> >>
>>>> >> SUCCESS! [0:38:43.010208]
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to