No worries at all Mike, thanks for the hard work everyone involved! I am
happy we fixed the issue and were able to backport a couple more fixes.

Cheers
Luca

On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 1:50 AM Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:

> OK I cherry-pick'd to 10.0.x and 10.x ... I think release is unblocked
> again!  Sorry about all of this ...
>
> I'll watch CI builds for any issues.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 4:43 PM Michael McCandless <
> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
>> OK the 9.12.x PR is merged ... I'll next cherry-pick to 10.0.x and 10.x.
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 12:36 PM Michael McCandless <
>> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Luca, I'm still actively working on the back compat break /
>>> blocker.  I'm hoping to finish the PR and merge it to 9.12.x later today,
>>> and then forward port to 10.0.x and 10.x.
>>>
>>> Mike McCandless
>>>
>>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 12:19 PM Luca Cavanna <java...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> All of the backports that we wanted to get in have been cherry picked,
>>>> as far as I know.
>>>>
>>>> I've seen quite a bit of activity on different PRs around the release
>>>> blocker, I know there's a couple of in-flight PRs, please give me a shout
>>>> when we are ready to go and I'll respin.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Luca
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 11:29 AM Luca Cavanna <java...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for raising this Mike, I am good with respinning.
>>>>>
>>>>> Chris is looking into the fix for the release blocker at
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13874 and forward porting it to
>>>>> branch_10_0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dawid, I am also good with backporting your fix, I commented in the PR
>>>>> about adding a missing CHANGES entry. Does this also need to be mentioned
>>>>> in the migrate guide?
>>>>>
>>>>> Another change we would like to make in branch_10_0 is
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13877 . This was made only in
>>>>> 9x so far, and is needed in 10 as well now that
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13221 has been reverted.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will go ahead and merge https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13858
>>>>> as well.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Luca
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 9:37 AM Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If we're respinning, can I also add this to the release branch?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13825
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This change affects the API of DataInput, which is an important core
>>>>>> interface, but it does have a strong rationale for people who use these
>>>>>> classes directly in downstream libraries.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll apply this change to branch_10x right now - without touching the
>>>>>> release branch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dawid
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 3:47 AM Michael McCandless <
>>>>>> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alas, I fear this issue is likely a (late breaking!) blocker for
>>>>>>> 10.0.0?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13867
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I (sadly) broke back compat in 9.12.0 when trying to open 9.11.x
>>>>>>> written indices using HNSW scalar quantization at defaults.  I have not
>>>>>>> tested but I strongly expect the current 10.0.0 RC to also have broken
>>>>>>> reading 9.11.x written indices (with HNSW scalar quantization) too.  
>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>> you to Ionut Anghelcovici Lucene user for catching this and opening a
>>>>>>> well-written issue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm first (now) trying to understand why our BWC tests are not
>>>>>>> catching this...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Separately, this at least (sigh) shows the benefits of
>>>>>>> releasing 9.last before 10.0!  Sorry about all of this!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mike McCandless
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 12:26 PM Patrick Zhai <zhai7...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>> SUCCESS! [1:08:46.194765]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 7:31 AM Benjamin Trent <
>>>>>>>> ben.w.tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:48:25.853452]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 8:31 AM Stefan Vodita <
>>>>>>>>> stefan.vod...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > +1 SUCCESS! [0:40:01.995275]
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 at 11:36, Luca Cavanna <java...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene 10.0.0
>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >> I published a draft of the release notes at
>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0
>>>>>>>>> . Feedback is welcome. Feel free to edit directly.
>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC3-rev-a4c0f741ccc5e5b86fc82fae150561c0b05a1dca
>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC3-rev-a4c0f741ccc5e5b86fc82fae150561c0b05a1dca
>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until
>>>>>>>>> 2024-10-09 17:00 UTC.
>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >> [ ] +1  approve
>>>>>>>>> >> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>>>>>>> >> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >> Here is my +1
>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >> SUCCESS! [0:38:43.010208]
>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>

Reply via email to