OK I cherry-pick'd to 10.0.x and 10.x ... I think release is unblocked
again!  Sorry about all of this ...

I'll watch CI builds for any issues.

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com


On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 4:43 PM Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com>
wrote:

> OK the 9.12.x PR is merged ... I'll next cherry-pick to 10.0.x and 10.x.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 12:36 PM Michael McCandless <
> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Luca, I'm still actively working on the back compat break /
>> blocker.  I'm hoping to finish the PR and merge it to 9.12.x later today,
>> and then forward port to 10.0.x and 10.x.
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 12:19 PM Luca Cavanna <java...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> All of the backports that we wanted to get in have been cherry picked,
>>> as far as I know.
>>>
>>> I've seen quite a bit of activity on different PRs around the release
>>> blocker, I know there's a couple of in-flight PRs, please give me a shout
>>> when we are ready to go and I'll respin.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Luca
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 11:29 AM Luca Cavanna <java...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for raising this Mike, I am good with respinning.
>>>>
>>>> Chris is looking into the fix for the release blocker at
>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13874 and forward porting it to
>>>> branch_10_0.
>>>>
>>>> Dawid, I am also good with backporting your fix, I commented in the PR
>>>> about adding a missing CHANGES entry. Does this also need to be mentioned
>>>> in the migrate guide?
>>>>
>>>> Another change we would like to make in branch_10_0 is
>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13877 . This was made only in 9x
>>>> so far, and is needed in 10 as well now that
>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13221 has been reverted.
>>>>
>>>> I will go ahead and merge https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13858
>>>> as well.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Luca
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 9:37 AM Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If we're respinning, can I also add this to the release branch?
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13825
>>>>>
>>>>> This change affects the API of DataInput, which is an important core
>>>>> interface, but it does have a strong rationale for people who use these
>>>>> classes directly in downstream libraries.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll apply this change to branch_10x right now - without touching the
>>>>> release branch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dawid
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 3:47 AM Michael McCandless <
>>>>> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alas, I fear this issue is likely a (late breaking!) blocker for
>>>>>> 10.0.0?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13867
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I (sadly) broke back compat in 9.12.0 when trying to open 9.11.x
>>>>>> written indices using HNSW scalar quantization at defaults.  I have not
>>>>>> tested but I strongly expect the current 10.0.0 RC to also have broken
>>>>>> reading 9.11.x written indices (with HNSW scalar quantization) too.  
>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>> you to Ionut Anghelcovici Lucene user for catching this and opening a
>>>>>> well-written issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm first (now) trying to understand why our BWC tests are not
>>>>>> catching this...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Separately, this at least (sigh) shows the benefits of
>>>>>> releasing 9.last before 10.0!  Sorry about all of this!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike McCandless
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 12:26 PM Patrick Zhai <zhai7...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>> SUCCESS! [1:08:46.194765]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 7:31 AM Benjamin Trent <ben.w.tr...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:48:25.853452]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 8:31 AM Stefan Vodita <
>>>>>>>> stefan.vod...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > +1 SUCCESS! [0:40:01.995275]
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 at 11:36, Luca Cavanna <java...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene 10.0.0
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> I published a draft of the release notes at
>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0
>>>>>>>> . Feedback is welcome. Feel free to edit directly.
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC3-rev-a4c0f741ccc5e5b86fc82fae150561c0b05a1dca
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC3-rev-a4c0f741ccc5e5b86fc82fae150561c0b05a1dca
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until
>>>>>>>> 2024-10-09 17:00 UTC.
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> [ ] +1  approve
>>>>>>>> >> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>>>>>> >> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> Here is my +1
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> SUCCESS! [0:38:43.010208]
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>

Reply via email to