[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13224709#comment-13224709
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3159:
-----------------------------------
As far as 3.x, i don't quite understand
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Jetty/Starting/Jetty_Version_Comparison_Table
What does this mean? does 'experimental' mean like Lucene's FST APIs or does it
just mean its only a few years old :)
Stable/experimental is not absolute and I'm just curious what opinions are.
Obviously jetty7 for 3.x is possibly an option?
*but*
Are the unicode bug fixes applied there?
Ryan already did the work for 8.x, 7.x would cost much more man hours...? is
8.x just stable enough?
> Upgrade to Jetty 8
> ------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-3159
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3159
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Ryan McKinley
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> Solr is currently tested (and bundled) with a patched jetty-6 version.
> Ideally we can release and test with a standard version.
> Jetty-6 (at codehaus) is just maintenance now. New development and
> improvements are now hosted at eclipse. Assuming performance is equivalent,
> I think we should switch to Jetty 8.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
