[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13224747#comment-13224747
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-3159:
-------------------------------------
bq. is 8.x just stable enough?
I'm confident the server is stable. I am not confident we have the most
appropriate settings in solr/example/etc/jetty.xml
These are the same settings we had for jetty 6, but I do not know if this is
still the best choice. In particular, I'm not sure about the
.bio.SocketConnector vs .nio.SelectChannelConnector
Uwe: to backport, we can use the same setup (jetty 8) but need to add in the
JSP jar files and change docs about starting the example. Unlike the
commons-csv issue, I am not concerned about the patched dependency here because
if someone wants to use a different jetty release they can do it and avoid the
JAR hell problems.
> Upgrade to Jetty 8
> ------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-3159
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3159
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Ryan McKinley
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> Solr is currently tested (and bundled) with a patched jetty-6 version.
> Ideally we can release and test with a standard version.
> Jetty-6 (at codehaus) is just maintenance now. New development and
> improvements are now hosted at eclipse. Assuming performance is equivalent,
> I think we should switch to Jetty 8.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
